food for thought

Jobaboba's Jokes Factory. (Only for those who are feeling silly)

Re: food for thought

Postby iamani » Sun Dec 20, 2020 4:41 pm

Greetings

78) n o m a n is a palindrome.

Cheers!
law is all is love is all is law
iamani
 
Posts: 539
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2016 5:06 pm

Re: food for thought

Postby Freeman Stephen » Wed Dec 23, 2020 8:18 pm

iamani wrote:Greetings

78) n o m a n is a palindrome.

Cheers!


ono sis non
User avatar
Freeman Stephen
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 1447
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 12:07 am

Re: food for thought

Postby iamani » Thu Dec 24, 2020 12:22 am

Hi Freeman Stephen

Can you prove that...?

Cheers!
law is all is love is all is law
iamani
 
Posts: 539
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2016 5:06 pm

Re: food for thought

Postby Freeman Stephen » Fri Dec 25, 2020 9:37 pm

Na mon :grin:

A palindrome is a word, number, phrase, or other sequence of characters which reads the same backward as forward


Saippuakivikauppias: A retailer of potash from finland!
User avatar
Freeman Stephen
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 1447
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 12:07 am

Re: food for thought

Postby iamani » Sat Dec 26, 2020 2:43 am

Hi Freeman Stephen

Exactly.

Merry Christmas and a happy new year!

Cheers!
law is all is love is all is law
iamani
 
Posts: 539
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2016 5:06 pm

Re: food for thought

Postby iamani » Sat Dec 26, 2020 7:06 pm

Greetings

i think i'm in love...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5Fmsi3dSwOo

Peter of England fans shouldn't watch this.

Cheers!
law is all is love is all is law
iamani
 
Posts: 539
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2016 5:06 pm

Re: food for thought

Postby iamani » Thu Dec 31, 2020 5:24 pm

Greetings

For those as yet unaware, member Treeman has some rather sad news to share:

viewtopic.php?f=63&t=11194

Such a terrible shame.

Cheers!
law is all is love is all is law
iamani
 
Posts: 539
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2016 5:06 pm

Re: food for thought

Postby iamani » Sun Jan 24, 2021 5:24 pm

Greetings

i recently came across a vid on YT by Steven Kirk on his new channel 'Minister EMOVEN' concerning a council tax summons he received. It was good and i enjoyed it  -  he points out flaws in the paperwork according to various facets of jurisdictions that a lot of us are familiar with.

Unfortunately though, he misses more than he spots and if you would like to test your own knowledge then i would suggest watching the video (it's only short) and see if you can spot what he missed...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=u5H4u0XZmwI

...and then check your score against the forensic audit of said correspondence that will be posted here shortly. i guarantee you will miss at least one.

Bonus points awarded to any who spot something that i miss... !

Cheers!
law is all is love is all is law
iamani
 
Posts: 539
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2016 5:06 pm

Re: food for thought

Postby Freeman Stephen » Mon Jan 25, 2021 4:35 pm

The thing that stands out to me is there's no mention of any trial. Just a hearing. The default position makes him liable unfairly without trial. Magna Carta prevents such a situation from being lawful in England and since the parliament relies on the magna carta for its existence, the parliament which proclaims magna carta abolished is a power foreign to England and its not Scotland.
User avatar
Freeman Stephen
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 1447
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 12:07 am

Re: food for thought

Postby iamani » Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:51 pm

Hi Freeman Stephen

Well tbf, he hasn't been accused of harm/damage/loss to his fellow man has he?

That there is no mention of a trial tells us this is not a common-law matter, but a matter of business and or discipline in which certain presumed-agreements/deemed-contracts (aka understandings) have been dishonoured, obligations left un-discharged, and that the various terms and conditions or rules and regulations of such understandings specifically provide for any such breach, with pre-determined penalties and consequences - which negates any need for a trial. A hearing of the facts under such circumstances is sufficient and indeed proper. It is a pre-determined default position agreed to (albeit unwittingly) by the recipient of the statement/offer. Agreement supercedes law.

"...that there is no provision in English law for administrative courts..."

Quite right - and the Magna Carta does forbid such. So the private administrative courts are operated under private international law, by consent of the governed. It seems that if you formally establish an existence in the private to the extent of complete self-governance (eg self-banking etc) you may rise above such courts just by relinquishing the Crown-debtor status.

Although i agree there may be foreign influence 'assisting' Parliament, the burying of the Magna Carta was achieved by popular ignorance and the public's apparent desire to engage in blind-contract in return for their very own little safe-space-bubbles and copious amounts of distraction/entertainment.

Also, no sitting monarch = no Magna Carta; and technically no (Her Majesty’s) Parliament.

Are you not comparing apples to oranges...?

Cheers!
law is all is love is all is law
iamani
 
Posts: 539
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2016 5:06 pm

PreviousNext

Return to The Lighter Side

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests