by pedawson » Mon Jul 18, 2011 9:23 pm
joeontheland Can you explain to me what it is you mean by 'This seems right to me'.
I believe you to be an intelligent soul and is able to figure out complicated problems, NO I don't mean to be sarcastic, I believe you are.
You can answer your own question, it just needs framing well.
Do you know what a 'FICTION' is?
Do you know what a 'Living Soul' is?
The answer to the above questions are all the proof you need.
The quote you are quoting states 'Fictions cannot connect with living souls'
If you believed they could, can you explain to me just how this could be achieved, I am genuinely interested if you can.
Now FICTIONS as in legal fiction 'DOES' exist, I have mine right here with me now. My legal fiction is 'Sentence case', 'Upper-case' and or lower-case it does not matter what case, the name given me officially is a LEGAL entity otherwise known as a fiction, it isn't 'ME'.
Push come to shove I doubt whether I could prove that I am a living soul, other than I breath, eat and communicate with others, however I am positive that my legal fiction cannot even exist except on paper and can only communicate through a living breathing sentient soul, it doesn't have to be me it could be anyone.
So 'how in gods name' could you ever 'SEE' proof that a title on a piece of paper 'could NOT' connect with a living soul.
You SEE living souls connect with other living souls on a daily basis but you have never seen a legal fiction connect with a living soul, or have you? So why if you have never seen this would you wish to see proof that it doesn't. The fact you haven't seen it, and you believe connection between fiction and soul is not possible should be indicative that it ain't going to happen.
Sorry if this seems insincere it isn't meant to be but the question you ask just could never make sense.
Or maybe I have it wrong (not beyond the bounds of possibility)
Namaste, phil;
Don't be surprised to discover that luck favours those who are prepared