Statute only carries the force of law with constent .. .

Discuss the difference between Common Law and the Statutory Acts made by the Powers that be, (PTB)

Re: Statute only carries the force of law with constent .. .

Postby greg » Mon Jul 11, 2011 10:49 pm

This thread should be called "statute only carries the force of law when backed up with the threat of force"
greg
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 342
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 1:36 pm

Re: Statute only carries the force of law with constent .. .

Postby holy vehm » Tue Jul 12, 2011 7:57 am

The courts also play a big part in this.
A lower court isnt able to decide on a common law argument put forward as a defence, it would need to be moved up or refered to a higher court. They primarily deal with statute law and statutory obligations. Did you break one of these obligations? then this is where you are dealt with.

You also have judicial review and judicial merit.

If you wanted to argue that council tax is unlawful and is not applicable to yourself, you will be invited to a magistrates court. They cant adjudicate this matter on a common law principal (they may try) but if you know how the system works you would appeal. The case gets moved up a notch, each time a decision is made you could appeal to a higher court, eventually ending up at the supreme court and from there the house of lords.

I suspect you would win your argument, but this is how far they make you take it. In front of the lords of the house you will find that the constitution plays a very important and significant role, that common law is paramount and very much valid.

Most court staff at the lower end have very little understanding of common law and the constitution, if they did they would be working higher up. I wouldnt even enter a magistrates court, its a place of statutory obligations, i live under common law, that means the high court and a jury.
"A ruler who violates the law is illegitimate. He has no right to be obeyed. His commands are mere force and coercion. Rulers who act lawlessly, whose laws are unlawful, are mere criminals".
User avatar
holy vehm
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 2914
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 7:17 pm
Location: http://www.fmotl.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=45&t=9142

Re: Statute only carries the force of law with constent .. .

Postby ArturoDekko » Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:07 am

a Statute is a "legislated rule of society given the force of law by the consent of the governed" [Black's Law Dictionary, revised 4th edition]
S E E F O R Y O U R S E L F

Know yourself and you shall know the truth. The truth shall set you free.
User avatar
ArturoDekko
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 645
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 11:17 am
Location: Carmarthenshire, Wales

Re: Statute only carries the force of law with constent .. .

Postby rebelwithoutaclue » Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:32 am

a Statute is a legislated rule of society forced apon you by a group of power hungry arseholes
“The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion.”
rebelwithoutaclue
 
Posts: 199
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 6:36 am
Location: Glasgow

Re: Statute only carries the force of law with constent .. .

Postby pitano1 » Thu Jul 14, 2011 7:49 am

exactly.

the law can give rise to,or create fictions,but fictions, cannot give rise
to law.

what we have now in the lower courts is nothing less than tyranny/treason.
also known as `corpis juris`.


all backed up by the CRIMINAL justus system,and the crown prostitution
service.

the people give rise to the law. `or do they?`,still.
If the machine of government is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then, I say, break the law.
Henry David Thoreau
ALL UNALIENABLE RIGHTS RESERVED -AB INITIO - Without Recourse - Non-Assumpsit
pitano1
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 936
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 1:38 pm
Location: on the land

Previous

Return to Common Law & Statute "Law"

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests