mokopuna1 wrote::mrgreen: Well I have read many answers and arguments about this topic and still confused.
As I understand it, one can use either although it seems the UCC-1 protects my property, but not so sure the PPSR does the same thing??? can one of you learned freeman explain briefly to me their opinion the diff if any
Cheers M1

I think 'treeman' in one post says it eloquently 'we are not teachers'. What is required of us all in this forum is education and knowledge, as shown by a multitude of members here.
There is a piece of advice that will stand you and all newcomers in good stead.
If you are having a problem, it is imperative that you research the subject and glean an understanding, the parts that you do not understand bring to the forum. First and foremost produce the literature in full for those who would be willing to help so they can evaluate for themselves. Explain what you think the documents are saying and ask for another interpretation.
The whole or part of these documents, you are speaking of, cannot be scrutinised if we don't have them.
The only method of getting to the bottom of something is through debate, a debate where both or all parties are ,as informed as each other.
It doesn't matter that you are in a different country if the system is generally the same, NZ and the UK use principally the same governmental procedures and the law is written in the same language 'legalese'.
Give us what yo understand along with the transcripts and ask what it is you require to know. We have a wealth of experience in reading, condensing and de-constructing legal documents. however without them you are going to struggle to get anyone to make a comment on your situation.
I would like to make something else clear, not just to you but to everyone, mainly the newbies. We CANNOT under any circumstances give 'advice' in an official capacity. Anything said within these four walls is strictly 'not' advice; even if the words 'advise or advice' themselves are used. We are principally here to assist in a 'McKenzie friend' way;
A McKenzie friend assists a litigant in person in a common law court. This person does not need to be legally qualified. The crucial point is that litigants in person are entitled to have assistance, lay or professional, unless there are exceptional circumstances.
This way, lawful advice is not illegal or unrecognised it is support 'in and for' your case.
Bring something we can get our teeth into, to the table, and you will see just how this forum works.
Namaste, phil;