NOUCOR to DVLA

A place for posting Notices of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Rights

NOUCOR to DVLA

Postby Free » Sun May 31, 2009 2:50 pm

DVLA
Swansea
SA99 1BA
Served by first class
Recorded delivery



1st June 2009
Reference: Vehicle known as [ ]


Notice of Understanding and Claim of Right



Dear DVLA

Please read the following notice thoroughly and carefully before responding. It is a notice. It informs you. It means what it says.

It is important that you consider and respond to the notice in substance. The 'nearest official form' will not suffice, and consequently is likely to be ignored by myself without any dishonour on my part.

On the other hand there is a time-limit on the notice being served. It is reasonable, and if it runs out then I shall take the understanding that you are in agreement with the points herein stated and that you have no objections to any or all of the points contained herein.

It is my understanding that notice to one is notice to all. Should you not be in a position to respond with clarity to the points stated herein it is my understanding that an officer of your choosing will be delegated the task of response and the name of said person will be made known to my self.

For these reasons it is recommended that you carefully consider this notice and respond in substance, which means addressing the points raised herein.

Failure to respond to this offer and to do so completely and in good faith within 14 (fourteen) working days will be deemed by all parties to mean you and your principal or other parties agree in full to the points made herein and whole heartedly accept this claim.

I now draw your professional attention to the following points.


It is my understanding that when a thing becomes registered with a body that the body it is registered to or with takes title ownership of said thing.

It is my understanding that in this case the thing in question is a device for use to aid roaming commonly called a vehicle by the DVLA

It is my understanding that a person who registers a vehicle gives up the right to own the vehicle in exchange for equitable title i.e. the right to keep or look after or store or use what is now in point of fact the property of DVLA.

It is my understanding that in doing so the keeper must abide by the rules of the society or corporation or body to which the vehicle is registered.

Consequently it is my understanding that subsequent keepers are not owners as stated in section C4c of the Registration Certificate which states: “The registered keeper is not necessarily the legal owner”

It is my understanding that this vital information is not fully and plainly disclosed on the contract known as the V5 Registration Certificate. For a contract to be valid it must contain FULL disclosure. It follows that since this vital information is not shown clearly on the contract it must be deemed that the contract is null and void.

It is my understanding that upon 1st registration a vehicle known as[ ]was registered with DVLA

It is my understanding that DVLA took title ownership of the vehicle known as at the moment of 1st registration.

It is my understanding that when the vehicle came into the possession of my self believing to be the new owner I was in point of fact only buying the right to use and not the right to own property of DVLA and that this vital information was kept from being disclosed to my self on the contract.

In consequence:


I hereby serve notice and state clearly, specifically and unequivocally, that under the laws and customs of England to which Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II has sworn to protect, I make claim to what is rightly, justly and lawfully mine.

I claim full lawful rights, allodial title and ownership of the conveyance known to DVLA as [ ] in my possession and the use of it freely on roads and highways and on private land, acting with reasonable care and responsibility to 3rd parties so long as I am not acting or involved in commerce. (Commerce defined as the buying and or selling of goods)

I claim my lawful right to roam and use any form of private conveyance on roads and highways without let, hindrance, levy, licence or duty.

I claim that any consent which may have been either expressed or implied by my self in regard to, or in relation to any statute regulating the operation of any form of conveyance on roads and highways and private property is withdrawn.

I claim that the registration of [ ] with DVLA is now withdrawn, be struck from record and voided.

I claim the right to fix reference plates of my choosing on my private conveyance formally known as [ ] to my design, colour and style and record my chosen reference of [ ] that any 3rd party may identify and refer to in such cases of harm or injury caused to or in the event of injury sustained by my self due to incident while operating the conveyance.

I claim the right to use or accept any word or words to describe a private conveyance being owned or used by my self or words used to describe the operation of the conveyance which will include but not limited to: vehicle, motor vehicle, driver, driving, car, motorcycle, or any word in relation to that private conveyance. And that the use or acceptance of those words does not in any way imply consent to stand under any statute.


Fee Schedule

I claim my fee schedule in regard to my Natural Born Lawful Right to freely travel on Her Majesty’s roads and highways.

£500 (five hundred) GB Pounds per hour for:

Any transgressions by police officers, government principles or their agents or participants in the system of justice or should I be stopped by a uniformed or non uniformed officer doing so without reasonable cause or prevented in going about my lawful peaceful right to roam, questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated be:

£5000 (five thousand) GB Pounds per hour:

Should I be handcuffed, arrested, transported, incarcerated, or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and notarised consent.

£20,000 (twenty thousand) GB Pounds (in addition to any compensation awarded)

Should violence be used against either my self or those under my care and protection, or damage or loss to my privately owned or borrowed or hired private conveyance.

I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potential criminal actions of any police officers, government officials, principals or agents or participants in the system of justice who, having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of property claimed and established rights and freedoms.
I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture both video and audio evidence of said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose I see fit.

Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within 14 (fourteen) working days of receipt of this notice. Responses are required to be made under oath or attestation upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and received via registered mail to:







Failure to record an appropriate dispute against the claims made herein will mean that you agree with my understanding and claims and will result in automatic default judgement and permanent and irrevocable estoppels by acquiescence barring any claims or the bringing of charges by you or any interested 3rd parties under any statute against my self for exercising my lawful and properly established Natural Born Rights and Freedoms.









Sincerely and without ill will, vexation or frivolity




By:



Agent

WITHOUT PREJUDICE, i.e. all Natural Inalienable Rights Reserved
Please address all future correspondence in the matter to a direct Human Self, namely[ ] as commonly called in short.
Ironic, that those who would consider us mad choose to live in the madness of an illusion
Free
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 291
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:59 am
Location: Sovereign Lands

Re: NOUCOR to DVLA

Postby makeithappen » Sun Jun 07, 2009 8:17 am

Could this be amended and be used for the land registry? Very impressive work, I might just send this one off !
makeithappen
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 2:33 pm

Re: NOUCOR to DVLA

Postby BaldBeardyDude » Sun Jun 07, 2009 8:27 am

I have only one criticism, Free - it's the definition of commerce, where you put

(Commerce defined as the buying and [color=#FF0000]or selling of goods) [/color]

It should be buying and selling as buying or selling is NOT commerce, as defined ONLY buying AND selling, thereby making a profit. Rob Menard explains it very well.

An item is bought and held until prices rise, then sold, making profit THIS is commerce, but if one buys, then adds value and sells, this is not commerce. Be very, VERY careful, Free - take out the OR, m8
They must find it hard to take Truth for authority who have so long mistaken Authority for Truth - Gerald Massey
User avatar
BaldBeardyDude
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 2256
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 8:42 am
Location: Telford, Shropshire

Re: NOUCOR to DVLA

Postby huntingross » Sun Jun 07, 2009 8:33 am

Hi makeit

I assume you mean by that, can you use it to un-register your land or property.

The land registry is a recording depository, I do not believe it is a 'stealing of ownership' like the DVLA....that is just my opinion though and might be proven wrong.

Such a claim to un-register your land is with a view to 'allodial title'...another assumption....

If there are any secured loans against your property, you can't have allodial title, whether you un-register it or not....because someone has either prior title or security over the title.

You need to remove (discharge) these burdens first.

In England and Wales, I think you then have to claim 'allodial title' and record it with the land registry.

In Scotland, all land is allodial since 2000, as long as it is clear of debt.

Allodial Title is dissolved by any subsequent secured loans, once the loan is discharged, you would have to claim again.

With such fragility of title, I personally will not be securing anything against my land.
Success nourishes hope
User avatar
huntingross
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4324
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 11:29 pm
Location: FIDACH, Near Edinburgh

Re: NOUCOR to DVLA

Postby BaldBeardyDude » Sun Jun 07, 2009 8:42 am

Seconded HR - 'tis a minefield aye!
They must find it hard to take Truth for authority who have so long mistaken Authority for Truth - Gerald Massey
User avatar
BaldBeardyDude
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 2256
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 8:42 am
Location: Telford, Shropshire

Re: NOUCOR to DVLA

Postby Free » Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:53 am

The 'Free-wheeler' to be, has been chosen for use as a guinea pig. It's not my main wheeler and is in secure off road placement. I'm not expecting this to be easy. It has been suggested to me that instead of working one's way upward from the bottom by serving notice to the related bodies it might be more productive to go direct to the transport minister and let the waves shower down over the minions.

I hear what you say there Baldy and will ammend the notice from buying or selling to buying and selling. How easily we can make these little slip ups eh.

Further it has been pointed out to me that of occasion i will use the term "I look forward to receiving your response"...I wont be using that word from now on as the act of 'receiving' is an admission of consent to contract.

Free
Ironic, that those who would consider us mad choose to live in the madness of an illusion
Free
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 291
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:59 am
Location: Sovereign Lands

Re: NOUCOR to DVLA

Postby BaldBeardyDude » Sun Jun 07, 2009 11:02 am

You make those changes and I think it's nigh on perfect, m8.

Bloody good job. Have you seen the thread here about Richard Harrison having done it? You may want to check it. He is known as Pleasuredome here, I think. Maybe a pm to him may help?
They must find it hard to take Truth for authority who have so long mistaken Authority for Truth - Gerald Massey
User avatar
BaldBeardyDude
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 2256
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 8:42 am
Location: Telford, Shropshire

Re: NOUCOR to DVLA

Postby Free » Sun Jun 07, 2009 11:30 am

Yes it was Richard's precedent which inspired me.

The one area needing locking down is insurance. The policymen care not for any 'vehicle' they suspect of having 'no insurance' (even though it's us the claim is made against and not the 'vehicle') and will promptly lift anything off the road which isnt identified by the pnc.

I know we have National Insurance, but a method of clearly noticing all those who wish to tamper with our property which can be verified somewhere along the line is needed. Remember the system is geared for compliance to the 'rules' and anything which stands proud of those 'rules' is not recognised and 'assumed' to be 'breaking the law'.

We have a long way to go on this one.
Ironic, that those who would consider us mad choose to live in the madness of an illusion
Free
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 291
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:59 am
Location: Sovereign Lands

Re: NOUCOR to DVLA

Postby jonboy » Sun Jun 07, 2009 1:07 pm

One thing puzzles me.

Why are we even bothered if we buy and sell goods on the highway. Commerce is not causing loss or harm to another individual. So perfectly lawful. I really do not see why anyone is bothered about this, being free means being free to do as we please, provided it is lawful, and as far as I can see, commerce is perfectly lawful. What's the big deal?? :puzz:
"Reason is the life of the law; nay, the common law itself is nothing else but reason. The law which is perfection of reason" Sir Edward Coke 1552-1634.

NO ONE RULES IF NO ONE OBEYS.

It is better to light one candle than to curse the darkness.
User avatar
jonboy
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 1375
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: Albion

Re: NOUCOR to DVLA

Postby Veronica » Sun Jun 07, 2009 2:19 pm

BaldBeardyDude wrote:It should be buying and selling as buying or selling is NOT commerce, as defined ONLY buying AND selling, thereby making a profit. Rob Menard explains it very well.

Shit! I missed that one! Thanks Pete. Template updated accordingly.

On the other hand ...
jonboy wrote:One thing puzzles me.
Why are we even bothered if we buy and sell goods on the highway. Commerce is not causing loss or harm to another individual. So perfectly lawful. I really do not see why anyone is bothered about this, being free means being free to do as we please, provided it is lawful, and as far as I can see, commerce is perfectly lawful. What's the big deal?? :puzz:

I totally agree. What is the big deal? I don't see any 'deal' actually. Fuck 'commerce' ... it's an illusion anyway.
Freedom's just another word for: "Nothing left to lose" (Janis Joplin)
"There is no path to peace, peace IS the path" (Mahatma Ghandi)
"There is no path to freedom, freedom IS the path" (Veronica Chapman)
User avatar
Veronica
Founder
Founder
 
Posts: 4537
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 1:28 pm
Location: Feltham, Sovereign Republic of England

Next

Return to NOUICORs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron