I must apologise to hrp.
I had not read his posts "agency for idiots" and "joinder for idiots" when I berated him for not mentioning that the vessel is a person.
He did state that fact, though you have to read both the previously mentioned posts to catch it:
HER MAJESTY AND AN ORGANIZATION. It’s the ultimate artificial person.
JOHN SCOTT DUNCAN = LEGAL NAME, LEGAL ENTITY, REGISTERED CROWN ORGANIZATION. This is where all the ACCOUNTING and SURETY happens. When you use this name, you are ACTING in COMMERCE. When you use this name, there is always a MONETARY VALUE attached to it. Under ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION this would be a “VESSEL”.
I apologise. I must add though that the LEGAL NAME/PERSON remains a VESSEL in maritime jurisdiction and should more accurately be referred to as a vessel, rather than an organisation, as it has multiple functions one of which is to transport the attached man from the Law of the Land jurisdiction to the maritime. A mere organisation does not suffice for that implied functionality.
My other criticism, as regards the lein, remains unchanged.