Turning Fraudulent Debt into a Commercial Injury Claim

Re: Turning a Fraudulent Lien into a Commercial Injury Claim

Postby Freeman-B » Wed Aug 05, 2009 8:33 am

Post removed as requested to it's own thread, here - viewtopic.php?f=59&t=2036

Apologies for any offence Michael, it was not intended. I, for one am very appreciative of your sterling efforts here and elsewhere.

:peace: :love:
B
Last edited by Freeman-B on Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would suffice. Einstein
Banking doesn’t “involve” fraud...banking IS fraud. Tim Madden
Freeman-B
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 455
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:04 pm
Location: Scotland/France

Re: Turning a Fraudulent Lien into a Commercial Injury Claim

Postby The Freeman-on-the-Land known as Michael » Wed Aug 05, 2009 8:43 am

Many thanks Brian.

Peace.
Last edited by The Freeman-on-the-Land known as Michael on Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
Nothing, except the truth, is like it seems to be.

All Rights Reserved - Without Prejudice - Without Recourse - Non-Assumpsit
User avatar
The Freeman-on-the-Land known as Michael
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:38 am

Re: Turning a Fraudulent Lien into a Commercial Injury Claim

Postby The Freeman-on-the-Land known as Michael » Wed Aug 05, 2009 8:51 am

MrFrodo wrote:
Therefore, I am hereby serving notice of my intention to discharge the alleged debt in full, using the same specie of money that Teevin Bastardos used to fund the alleged loan, provided that I receive specific answers to the following questions:



Hate to press Michael but I really do not comprehend the above. How could you practically discharge the debt using the same specie used to fund it? Are you suggesting you would write another promissary note ?

Frodo

This thread at ThinkFreeForums should clear up any confusion on this matter:

http://www.thinkfreeforums.org/viewtopic.php?f=71&t=8390

To my knowledge, what George achieved was without precedent, despite the fact that there were flaws in his process. Nevertheless, this proves that if the Credit Bandits will not accept our promissory notes, the clerk of the court will. Only a few days ago in Australia, another friend of mine succeeded with the same method on a CSA issue, when he discharged a liability of $21,000.

Peace.
Nothing, except the truth, is like it seems to be.

All Rights Reserved - Without Prejudice - Without Recourse - Non-Assumpsit
User avatar
The Freeman-on-the-Land known as Michael
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:38 am

Re: Turning a Fraudulent Lien into a Commercial Injury Claim

Postby city boy 5705 » Wed Aug 05, 2009 10:04 am

I'm wondering Michael if you have a "UK" version that you may have created/come across lurking on your hard drive , perhaps in Word format of the promisory note that George from the thinkfree forum used.......?
city boy 5705
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 9:01 am

Re: Turning a Fraudulent Lien into a Commercial Injury Claim

Postby MrFrodo » Wed Aug 05, 2009 10:40 am

Thanks for that link Michael, I had found the thread of the same name as this thread over at thinkfree but had not spotted GJA's. Looks like it will make very interesting reading.

One more thing in regards to your process,...I may have been hit by a stupido here but you say:

"If no claim has been filed by the credit bandits, then a claim form needs to be filed with the county court (to get a file number), then when the entire process has been completed with the establishment of administrative default judgment, all of the douments lsted above would be filed at the same time. The other party would be given a certain period of time, usually 7-10 days, to rebut your claim, but if no counterclaimis filed the judge makes out an order in favour of the creditor."

For administrative default judgement to occur do all the notices and affidavit need to be filed FIRST, as opposed to when the whole process is over?


Frodo
You see what happens Larry? You see what happens when you fuck a stranger in the ass?
MrFrodo
 
Posts: 303
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:30 pm

Re: Turning a Fraudulent Lien into a Commercial Injury Claim

Postby MrFrodo » Wed Aug 05, 2009 10:50 am

It's ok...

By 'administrative default judgement' in the context you mention above, would I be correct in saying that you mean 'default' in the private by dishonour of the notices and issue of default notice ? And it is this that constitutes default judgement in that context ?

I was confused over the term default judgement, did not realise dishonour of notices and then default notice = administrative defualt judgement as I thought that only refered to when a court gives it.

Perhaps I just avoided the stupido :P

Frodo
You see what happens Larry? You see what happens when you fuck a stranger in the ass?
MrFrodo
 
Posts: 303
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:30 pm

Re: Turning a Fraudulent Lien into a Commercial Injury Claim

Postby The Freeman-on-the-Land known as Michael » Thu Aug 06, 2009 4:07 pm

PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
ROBIN HOODY (CEO)
ROBIN HOODIES LIMITED (DEBTOR)
REGISTERED OFFICE

COMPANY NUMBER
CONSUMER CREDIT LICENSE NUMBER

DATE

NOTICE OF LIEN INTEREST

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT


Dear Robin Hoody,

Pursuant to the clearly expressed terms of your company’s dishonour of NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE dated _______________________, NOTICE REQUESTING ADEQUATE ASSURANCE OF DUE PERFORMANCE dated _______________________, NOTICES OF DISHONOUR & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE dated ______________________ and ________________________ respectively, I hereby serve NOTICE OF LIEN INTEREST.

For the avoidance of doubt, STRAWMAN has a commercial injury claim against ROBIN HOODIES LIMITED, valued at GBP£26,000.00 (TWENTY SIX THOUSAND GREAT BRITISH POUNDS STERLING).

The DEBTOR has seven (7) days from service of this notice to raise any issues, disputes or counterclaims pertaining to this matter.

Without malice, mischief, ill will, frivolity or vexation, in sincerity and honour,


By: Upper-Case: Lower
Authorised Representative for STRAWMAN
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted

Nothing, except the truth, is like it seems to be.

All Rights Reserved - Without Prejudice - Without Recourse - Non-Assumpsit
User avatar
The Freeman-on-the-Land known as Michael
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:38 am

Re: Turning a Fraudulent Lien into a Commercial Injury Claim

Postby The Freeman-on-the-Land known as Michael » Thu Aug 06, 2009 4:16 pm

Affidavit of Obligation

Commercial Lien

A Verified Plain Statement of Fact



The Parties:

Lien Claimant:

Upper-case: Lower
Authorised Representative
STRAWMAN
MAILING LOCATION

Hereinafter known as “Lien Claimant”


Lien Debtor:

Robin Hoody (CEO)
ROBIN HOODIES LIMITED
MAILING LOCATION

Hereinafter known as “Lien Debtor”



Legal Maxims:

Truth as a valid statement of reality is sovereign in commerce.

An un-rebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce.

An un-rebutted affidavit is acted upon as the judgment in commerce.

All men shall have a remedy by the due course of law. If a remedy does not exist, or if the
existing remedy has been subverted, then one may create a remedy for themselves and endow it with
credibility by expressing it in their affidavit.

Except for a Jury, it is also a fatal offense for any person, even a Judge, to impair or to expunge, without a
Counter-Affidavit, any Affidavit or any commercial process based upon an Affidavit.

A foreclosure by a summary judgment (non-jury) without a commercial bond is a violation of commercial
law.

An official (officer of the court, policeman, etc.) must demonstrate that he/she is individually bonded in
order to use a summary process.

An official who impairs, debauches, voids or abridges an obligation of contract or the effect of a
Commercial Lien without proper cause becomes a lien debtor, and his/her property becomes forfeited as
a pledge to secure the lien.

It is against the law for a Judge to summarily remove, dismiss, dissolve or diminish a Commercial Lien.
Only the Lien Claimant or a Jury can dissolve a commercial lien.

Notice to agent is notice to principal; notice to principal is notice to agent.



Allegations:

The following allegations arise from the conduct of Lien Debtor & the Agents of, indirectly and non-directly, in relation to an alleged agreement between the parties, having regard to CAPITAL TWO MISTERCARD ACCOUNT NUMBER ****************.

1. There is no evidence to suggest that a legally enforceable original Consumer Credit Agreement is in existence between the parties, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
2. There is no evidence to suggest that the allegedly outstanding balance of GBP£6,500.00 on the above referenced account can be verified by Lien Debtor, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
3. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Debtor’s valuable consideration pertaining to the alleged debt can be validated upon reasonable request by Lien Claimant, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
4. There is no evidence to suggest that the alleged outstanding balance of the above account was not legally discharged when Lien Debtor refused to accept the specie of payment tendered by STRAWMAN on _____________________, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
5. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Debtor is not in multiple breaches of the Office of Fair Trading’s Final Guidance on Unfair Business Practices (updated December 2006).
6. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Debtor, by its dishonour of Lien Claimant’s NOTICE REQUESTING ADEQUATE ASSURANCE OF DUE PERFORMANCE dated __________________ and NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE dated _______________________, is not concealing material facts pertaining to any existing and legally enforceable agreement between the parties, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
7. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Debtor lent its own money as adequate consideration to purchase the promissory note (loan agreement) from Lien Claimant, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
8. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Claimant did not provide valuable consideration to fund the alleged loan(s) from Lien Debtor, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
9. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Debtor did not accept an item of value from Lien Claimant that was used to give value to a cheque, electronic transfer or similar instrument, of approximately the same value of the alleged loan(s), and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
10. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Debtor followed UK GAAP (the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles of the United Kingdom) in the execution of the alleged loan(s), and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
11. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Debtor’s chartered accountant and auditor at the time of the alleged loan(s) can confirm that Lien Debtor followed UK GAAP in the execution of the alleged loan(s), and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
12. There is no evidence to suggest that the intent of the alleged loan agreement is that the party who funded the loan(s) is not the party that is to be repaid the money, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
13. There is no evidence to suggest that all the material facts of the alleged loan(s) agreement have been disclosed to Lien Claimant, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
14. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Claimant was obliged to lend the promissory note to Lien Debtor or another financial institution, in order to fund the alleged loan(s), and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
15. There is no evidence to suggest that the original Consumer Credit Agreement (promissory note) has not been altered or stolen, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
16. There is no evidence to suggest that the alleged borrower (Lien Claimant) did not provide the funds that the alleged lender (Lien Debtor) claims were lent to Lien Claimant, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
17. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Debtor does not owe Lien Claimant a sum of money treble the value of Lien Debtor’s invalid claim, plus the principal, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
18. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Claimant has not already procured the tacit agreement of Lien Debtor that all of the allegations set forth in this Affidavit are factually correct, true and complete, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.


Proof of Allegations:

1. Lien Debtor affirms that there is no legally enforceable original Consumer Credit Agreement in existence between the parties. If no timely rebuttal it is AFFIRMED.
2. Lien Debtor affirms that the allegedly outstanding balance of GBP£6,500.00 on the above referenced account cannot be verified by Lien Debtor. If no timely rebuttal it is AFFIRMED.
3. Lien Debtor affirms that Lien Debtor’s valuable consideration pertaining to the alleged debt cannot be validated upon reasonable request by Lien Claimant. If no timely rebuttal it is AFFIRMED.
4. Lien Debtor affirms the alleged outstanding balance of the above account was legally discharged when Lien Debtor refused to accept the specie of payment tendered by STRAWMAN on _____________________. If no timely rebuttal it is AFFIRMED.
5. Lien Debtor affirms that it has committed multiple breaches of the Office of Fair Trading’s Final Guidance on Unfair Business Practices (updated December 2006. If no timely rebuttal it is AFFIRMED.
6. Lien Debtor affirms that it has concealed material facts pertaining to any existing and legally enforceable agreement between the parties. If no timely rebuttal it is AFFIRMED.
7. Lien Debtor affirms that it did not lend its own money as adequate consideration to purchase the promissory note (alleged loan agreement) from Lien Claimant. If no timely rebuttal it is AFFIRMED..
8. Lien Debtor affirms that Lien Claimant provided valuable consideration to fund the alleged loan(s) to Lien Claimant. If no timely rebuttal it is AFFIRMED.
9. Lien Debtor affirms that Lien Debtor accepted an item of value from Lien Claimant that was used to give value to a cheque, electronic transfer or similar instrument, of approximately the same value of the alleged loan(s),. If no timely rebuttal it is AFFIRMED.
10. Lien Debtor affirms that Lien Debtor did not follow UK GAAP (the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles of the United Kingdom) in the execution of the alleged loan(s). If no timely rebuttal it is AFFIRMED.
11. Lien Debtor affirms that Lien Debtor’s chartered accountant and auditor at the time of the alleged loan(s) cannot confirm that Lien Debtor followed UK GAAP in the execution of the alleged loan(s). If no timely rebuttal it is AFFIRMED.
12. Lien Debtor affirms that the alleged loan agreement stipulates that the party who funded the loan(s) is the party that is to be repaid the money. If no timely rebuttal it is AFFIRMED.
13. Lien Debtor affirms that all the material facts of the alleged loan(s) agreement have not been disclosed to Lien Claimant. If no timely rebuttal it is AFFIRMED.
14. Lien Debtor affirms that according to the alleged loan agreement, Lien Claimant was not obliged to lend the promissory note to Lien Debtor or another financial institution, in order to fund the alleged loan(s). If no timely rebuttal it is AFFIRMED..
15. Lien Debtor affirms that the original Consumer Credit Agreement (promissory note) has been altered or stolen. If no timely rebuttal it is AFFIRMED.
16. Lien Debtor affirms that the alleged borrower (Lien Claimant) provided the funds that the alleged lender (Lien Debtor) claims were lent to Lien Claimant. If no timely rebuttal it is AFFIRMED.
17. Lien Debtor affirms that Lien Debtor owes Lien Claimant a sum of money treble the value of Lien Debtor’s invalid claim, plus the principal. If no timely rebuttal it is AFFIRMED.
18. Lien Debtor affirms that Lien Claimant has already procured the tacit agreement of Lien Debtor that all of the allegations set forth in this Affidavit are factually correct, true and complete.


Ledgering:

The value of this Commercial Lien is treble the value of Lien Debtor’s invalid claim of GBP£6,500.00 Great British Pounds Sterling (or functional currency of the UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND, &/or its successors), plus the principal of GBP£6,500.00 Great British Pounds Sterling (or functional currency of the UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND, &/or its successors).

TOTAL AMOUNT OWED TO LIEN CLAIMANT IS GBP£ 26,000.00
TWENTY SIX THOUSAND GREAT BRITISH POUNDS STERLING


Surety:

Surety for the value of this Commercial Lien is ROBIN HOODIES LIMITED, including, without limitation, any and all of its property, products, proceeds, fittings and fixtures. If payment of GBP£26,000.00 is not received in full by Lien Claimant from Lien Debtor within the stipulated time, the public liability insurance policy of Lien Debtor will be claimed in order to satisfy any remaining value.


AFFIRMATION


I, Upper-Case: Lower, Authorised Representative for STRAWMAN (Lien Claimant), hereby affirm upon my own unlimited commercial liability and under penalty of perjury, that I have read all of the contents of pages 1-7 of this Affidavit of Obligation, and to the very best of my knowledge, I believe that the facts expressed herein are true, correct and complete.



________________________________________________________
(Autographed in blue ink & sealed with a right thumbprint in red ink)
By: Upper-Case: Lower
Authorised Representative for STRAWMAN (Lien Claimant)
All Rights Reserved – Without Recourse - Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted



VERIFICATION

Declared, autographed and sealed before me, _________________, on the _______ day of the month of ________, in the year two thousand and ______.

Notary Public: Notary Seal:

Notary Public’s office location to receive responses




Signed & Sealed By: __________________________________________


NOTICE is hereby given that the Lien Debtor has ten (10) days after receipt of this Affidavit of Obligation to rebut, deny, or otherwise prove invalid the allegations contained herein. Failure to rebut, deny or otherwise disprove any of the allegations contained herein will be construed as Lien Debtors’ affirmation that said allegations have been proven to be true, correct and complete.

Void where prohibited by law.
Last edited by The Freeman-on-the-Land known as Michael on Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:31 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Nothing, except the truth, is like it seems to be.

All Rights Reserved - Without Prejudice - Without Recourse - Non-Assumpsit
User avatar
The Freeman-on-the-Land known as Michael
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:38 am

Re: Turning Fraudulent Debt into a Commercial Injury Claim

Postby Freeman-B » Thu Aug 06, 2009 5:53 pm

Now that, my friend, is sheer class :clap: :clap:

:peace: :love:
B
He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would suffice. Einstein
Banking doesn’t “involve” fraud...banking IS fraud. Tim Madden
Freeman-B
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 455
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:04 pm
Location: Scotland/France

Re: Turning a Fraudulent Lien into a Commercial Injury Claim

Postby Farmer » Thu Aug 06, 2009 6:27 pm

The Freeman-on-the-Land known as Michael wrote:It is against the law for a Judge to summarily remove, dismiss, dissolve or diminish a Commercial Lien.
Only the Lien Claimant or a Jury can dissolve a commercial lien.


Michael that's a very impressive document.

Do you know whether the maxim is from the US or international?
If you're scared of 'them' poisoning 'us' with some shit then maybe you haven't noticed the shit they are already poisoning us with.
- prajna - fmotl.co.uk forum 2011
User avatar
Farmer
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 1989
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:07 am

PreviousNext

Return to Mortgages

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron