NEW, contempt of court

NEW, contempt of court

Postby holy vehm » Fri Jan 28, 2011 10:00 am

Some of you may have missed the recent link addition to the forum (contempt of court unravelled) under the main header.

Here is the link http://contempt.fmotl.com/

As ever, very useful and detailed information, provided by veronica.

namaste
"A ruler who violates the law is illegitimate. He has no right to be obeyed. His commands are mere force and coercion. Rulers who act lawlessly, whose laws are unlawful, are mere criminals".
User avatar
holy vehm
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 3077
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 7:17 pm
Location: http://www.fmotl.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=45&t=9142

Re: NEW, contempt of court

Postby holy vehm » Fri Jan 28, 2011 10:08 am

Quoted from the contempt of court article.

"If you read all those quotations again ... which by the way, you can use in Court ... since you will be quoting from Archbold ... then the conclusions you can draw are:

1. Only Judges, Magistrates and Clerks of the Courts can be held as having been in Contempt of Court if they don't act STRICTLY under their Oaths of Office. Thus, when demanding them to repeat their Oath - and they say that is irrelevant - you can say "It is far from irrelevant, according to what Lord Diplock said, which is quoted in Archbold. Would you like a copy of what he said?". The point is that, IN LAW, mens rea is a crucial factor, i.e. INTENT. When refusing to give your Name, etc. what is your INTENT? The answer is to refuse the deception of acquiescing to Admiralty Law, by virtue of being a Land-dweller and only subject to the Law-of-the-Land. Whereas their INTENT is to deceive you into acquiescing to the Laws-of-Waters (whether they realise it [Judges] or not [Magistrates]!). YOU are attempting to bring the entire Court back to honourable, true, real 'justice' ... whereas they are trying to pervert that course.

2. You can't be in Contempt of a Court where the Judge is sitting alone ... because s/he is unaffected. You can be in contempt of the other Party ... but NOT of the Judge or the Court. (Fundamentally this saying that a Judge's shoulders should be sufficiently broad as to brush off even direct insults! Assuming, of course, they acted diligently and with integrity, i.e. under their Oaths, etc). Without any shadow of a doubt a Local Council (for example) will be in contempt of you ... otherwise they would not have summonsed you.

3. And note: "There is no impediment to a court making a finding of contempt, when it is appropriate to do so, not against the Crown directly but against a government department or a minister of the Crown in his official capacity". This must (in their little world) include Local Councils."
"A ruler who violates the law is illegitimate. He has no right to be obeyed. His commands are mere force and coercion. Rulers who act lawlessly, whose laws are unlawful, are mere criminals".
User avatar
holy vehm
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 3077
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 7:17 pm
Location: http://www.fmotl.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=45&t=9142

Re: NEW, contempt of court

Postby MikeThomas » Fri Jan 28, 2011 10:27 am

Excellent research there Veronica! :yes:

Keep bumping this topic please or, if someone has the know how, can we make it 'sticky'?
We are the people our parents told us NOT TO PLAY WITH
User avatar
MikeThomas
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 1623
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 1:17 pm
Location: Llanharan, South Wales

Re: NEW, contempt of court

Postby Strange » Fri Jan 28, 2011 9:09 pm

Thanks for the information very interesting
Strange
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:27 pm

Re: NEW, contempt of court

Postby ArturoDekko » Sat Jan 29, 2011 11:30 am

Brilliant :clap:
S E E F O R Y O U R S E L F

Know yourself and you shall know the truth. The truth shall set you free.
User avatar
ArturoDekko
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 647
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 11:17 am
Location: Carmarthenshire, Wales

Re: NEW, contempt of court

Postby tritowns » Thu May 24, 2012 12:45 pm

new, here... lots of work for my printer i see... thank you all for your hard work and bring this to us.
tritowns
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 12:24 pm

Re: NEW, contempt of court

Postby squark » Sat Sep 29, 2012 9:20 pm

Gordon Hall (creditors in commerce) advises if threatened with contempt (its a threat)
Very good your Honour in that case, in order to avoid being held in contempt, under threat, duress and coercion I will say what ever you want me to say and do whatever you want me to do.

You just offered him a contract, if he doesn't say no then you are free to assume yes, just make sure you do what you promised and say just what he wants you to.
Wait for the next question and ask how he would like you to answer. Its all done under duress so is not binding.

Its a game. You Ping....They Pong... :grin:
And the Lord spake unto his people, he said "Get Off MY Bloody Land!"
And the people gave unto the Lord, freely they gave him The Finger
squark
 
Posts: 326
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 5:41 pm
Location: Stoke on Trent


Return to The Court System

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests