PENHALLOW V. DOAN'S SUPREME COURT RULING
Here is veronica's words reading from an alleged court ruling at the liverpool meeting, given from a US supreme court ruling, here is a link
http://supreme.justia.com/us/3/54/case.html
“In as much as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons, the imaginary
Having neither actuality nor substance is foreclosed from creating and attaining parody with the tangible,
The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court etc can concern itself with anything other than corporate artificial persons, and the contracts between them.
They must give you to be your name, because if they don’t they cannot’ interact with you”.
So my question this were in this ruling does it say this, I can’t find it,veronica has made a very bold statement on this saying the peope doing business as the supreme court are of the opinion,humans are in fact artifictial persons when in court,because this is all they can interact with.
We need this clarified.