MoJ / Court Impartiality

MoJ / Court Impartiality

Postby cjwood555 » Mon Apr 12, 2010 8:08 am

I sent this one in a while ago - they've actually declined to respond, despite the request being for recorded information. The implications of their response are quite far and wide -reaching!!

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/conflict_of_interests_2

Chris
"The purpose of life, is a life of purpose"
cjwood555
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 2:10 pm
Location: Solihull

Re: MoJ / Court Impartiality

Postby MikeThomas » Mon Apr 12, 2010 9:23 am

OF COURSE THEY'RE NOT GOING TO RESPOND!!!! If they responded the illusion would fall away.

For the record though, the ECHR (Article 6) states that you are entitled to a fair and impartial hearing. Now ask yourself: If the Police & Courts & CPS all work for the Crown (Government) how can they guarantee a fair hearing?

The answer is they can't, so how do you get a fair & impartial hearing? Spend thousands of pounds taking your case to the European Courts? There's another contradiction! Doesn't it say in Magna Carta that "We will neither deny or sell justice to any man?

The plain truth is that we have no lawful recourse or remedy which is one of the reasons we become members here!
We are the people our parents told us NOT TO PLAY WITH
User avatar
MikeThomas
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 1634
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 1:17 pm
Location: Llanharan, South Wales

Re: MoJ / Court Impartiality

Postby tomrush » Mon Apr 12, 2010 7:32 pm

Don't expect anything from the Ministry of "Justice" - they're a bunch of fools.
User avatar
tomrush
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 1:28 am
Location: Sovereign State of Mises, C.O.B.S.

Re: MoJ / Court Impartiality

Postby cjwood555 » Mon Apr 12, 2010 9:16 pm

This is case of trying to extract an admission, more than anything else....
"The purpose of life, is a life of purpose"
cjwood555
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 2:10 pm
Location: Solihull

Re: MoJ / Court Impartiality

Postby tomrush » Mon Apr 12, 2010 10:52 pm

The easiest way to extract an admission is to use numbered points, with a qualifier that if all points are not answered substantively, then they agree that *insert what you're trying to get at here*.
User avatar
tomrush
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 1:28 am
Location: Sovereign State of Mises, C.O.B.S.

Re: MoJ / Court Impartiality

Postby cjwood555 » Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:52 pm

Hi Tom,

I am aware of that method and have used it before with great success. However, in this case I wanted to come across more gently and hope that they would volunteer some sort of response. There's no point trying to tell them the answers - if we want to learn, we need to ask questions and listen to what they have to say.

Regards,
Chris
"The purpose of life, is a life of purpose"
cjwood555
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 2:10 pm
Location: Solihull


Return to Freedom of Information only

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests