Massive abuse of power going on ???

Re: Massive abuse of power going on ???

Postby Oliver Cromwell » Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:41 pm

Those courts are contrary to the Common Law. Since the law must not merely be upheld but must be seen to be upheld.
'He whom the Son has made free is free indeed'
User avatar
Oliver Cromwell
 
Posts: 322
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 12:25 pm

Re: Massive abuse of power going on ???

Postby Hope » Fri Oct 23, 2009 7:59 pm

The Secret family Courts are held behind closed doors , so the people are none the wiser to
the corruption occurring on a daily basis.

Family's are being destroyed by a corrupt system that is rotten from the very top to the bottom.

Children are being stolen from family's that love and want them dearly, whilst other children are being left
to suffer abuse.

These courts and judges (if you can call them that ) dont care about the Law only the money that is going into their back pockets.
Hope
 
Posts: 328
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 8:32 pm

Re: Massive abuse of power going on ???

Postby Hope » Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:29 pm

Mein Kampf, Adolph Hitler said "The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation."
Hope
 
Posts: 328
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 8:32 pm

Re: Massive abuse of power going on ???

Postby Hope » Fri Nov 20, 2009 1:14 am

Tracy Dawber, Social Worker Child Porn & Abuse

http://www.southportvisiter.co.uk/southport-news/southport-southport-news/2009/11/20/sefton-council-social-worker-on-child-porn-and-abuse-charge-101022-25209653/

A SEFTON Council social worker has appeared in court on child sex offence charges following the investigation into paedophile Colin Blanchard.
Care practitioner Tracy Dawber, 43, of Guildford Road, Southport, faced the allegations early yesterday morning at South Sefton Magistrates’ Court in Bootle, where she was hauled before JPs.
The 11 charges are as a result of an alleged link to 38-year-old Blanchard, a former Information Technology salesman who is originally from the Norris Green area of Liverpool.
Dawber, who was immediately suspended by Sefton Council from her role as a community care practitioner, faces four counts of possessing indecent images of children.
She faces five counts of permitting indecent images of children to be made and one charge of sexual assault on a child under 13.
She also faces a further count of facilitating the sexual assault of a child.
The mother pleaded not guilty to all counts during the hearing.
Charges against her are not linked to the Little Teds Nursery in Plymouth.
That case sparked massive public outrage and Blanchard admitted a string of child abuse offences at Bristol crown court last month alongside nursery worker Vanessa George and Angela Allen, both 39.
Blanchard, from Smallbridge, near Rochdale, Greater Manchester, is currently awaiting sentence alongside George, of Plymouth, and Allen, from Nottingham
Dawber was yesterday remanded in custody to appear before a committal hearing before JPs on December 30
She wore a long black jumper and clutched her side in the secure glass- panelled dock throughout the hearing.
Chairman of the magistrates’ bench Mr David Dixon took the decision to refuse her bail.
The trial will be held at Liverpool crown court.
Dawber will appear by video link at the committal hearing.
She worked at Southport general hospital on behalf of Sefton Council as a community practitioner for some time.
And neighbours, who describe her as “pleasant”, say that she suffers from pain in both her legs and feet and she has recently put on lots of weight.
It is believed that Dawber is from a big family and has a number of siblings.
Her mother is of Irish descent and her father, who died last year, was originally from the Liverpool area.
A spokesman for Sefton Council told the Visiter last night that Dawber was suspended from her role and the authority is co-operating with the police with their enquiries.
He said: “As soon as we were made aware of these allegations a community care practitioner was immediately suspended.
“This person’s role involved assessing adults in hospital with a view to providing care support when patients return to the community.”
He added: “We are co-operating fully with the police and will be unable to comment further for legal reasons.”
Superintendent Peter Edge of Merseyside Police said: “Yesterday (Wednesday) a 43-year-old women from Southport was charged with a number of offences relating to possessing and making indecent images of a child and sexual activity with a child.
“She appeared in the magistrates court today and has been remanded in custody.
“I cannot comment on the investigation or go into any details of the case. The investigation is ongoing.
“However, we have received a number of calls today from concerned members of the public who thought she may have worked with children in the area.
“I would like to reassure people that the woman involved in this case does not work at a local nursery or school.”
Hope
 
Posts: 328
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 8:32 pm

Re: Massive abuse of power going on ???

Postby Hope » Thu Dec 10, 2009 10:03 pm

Kent Common Purpose

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/20594/response/54245/attach/html/3/FOI.pdf.html

FOI/09/1149 – FOI/09/1159


Nicholas Sherlock

Start date 2 February 1998 - 12 November 2000
Team Leader SSD – Sevenoaks C&F team (Children & Families)
13 November 2000 - 28 April 2002

Project Officer - Duty/Screening Project Social Services
29 April 2002 - 30 June 2005

Performance Improvement Manager HQ - Performance Policy Planning
01 July 2005 - 31 March 2006

Public Involvement & Performance Manager HQ - Performance Policy
Planning
01 April 2006 - 5 April 2009

Public Involvement & Performance Manager Performance Improvement
06 April 2009 - 30 September 2009

Head of Planning & Public Involvement Restructuring Transition
01 October 2009 - to date
Head of Planning & Public Involvement Planning & Public Involvement
Hope
 
Posts: 328
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 8:32 pm

Re: Massive abuse of power going on ???

Postby Hope » Thu Dec 10, 2009 11:11 pm

All stolen children must be returned, it is their birth right

This about sums up the system at present,
somebody commented on an article in the Times.

Children with single parents are 100% more likely to suffer mental health problems not 40%.

New Labour continue to cause extreme mental torture to British Children and Parents to the extent of New Labour MP's committing the most EVIL acts of child and adult cruelty since the Nazi party.

New Labour have set out with the intention of causing children and parents to suffer the exact same emotions of the families whose children have been murdered by psychopaths.

The loss of a child / children is the same whether in a family court or by some mentally ill street thug.

However the evil manner Harriet Harman has allowed family law workers to plunder the lives of British children and adults does raise the question of who in this world is to tackle the constant barbaric conduct of family law workers being that Brown and Camron seek to favour those taking children rather than funding those trying to repel the evil state funded agents, being paid to snatch kids for money.

Harriet Harman an expert in family law has continued to turn a blind eye to the billions of tax payers money being pumped into the family law slave trade.

It is not one or two loan voices in Britian saying that family law courts have taken their children, their friends children or a grandparents child, IT IS an entire nation who have stood back and watched in disbelief as millions of UK children are torn by brute force from perfectly decent parents in ''OPEN'' secret family law courts.

The family law courts remain closed, they continue to charge parents of state abducted children a fee to use the system, and Harriet Harman has not only let this continue, she and Jack Straw have seen how family law courts can generate billions of pounds worth of public sector employment by charging parents of state taken kids a fee to fight for their basic human right to see their own kids.

The moral question for the nation is do we fund a family law system paid to take children for no reason and then charge the victim a fee to fight for his or her child / children?

O do we say, enough is enough, stop this evil trade, stop taking children for money in family law courts because it is as evil as murder and Britian should not be known around the world as a child snatching capital where family law workers flock to because taking children for money has become funded by New Labour via our hard earned taxes.

Parents who lose their children in family courts invariably do so without good reason, without a jury, without being allowed to speak, with the constant sending to prison in chains when the scream out loud at family law injustice.

The cost to the tax payer is enormous and the clean up bill for the mental health treatment needed to treat the sufferers of family law child slave trading is causing 100%, not 40% of children and parents to become mentally tortured.

We can NOT live as a nation of people where just next door the family law worker arrives mob handed with family court orders and a van to take away either the child or the parent or both.

Word of children being taken flys around the school playground, flys around the work place, and the streets, causing a nation to be terrified more of family law workers than then the evil of terrorism.


This evil family law slave trade is a product of New Labour mentality and it is not 40% it is 100% who are suffering mental torture and fear of losing out children in secret family law courts that claim to be open but are not open, they are not free to use, and they DO send any protesting parent to jail if they try and see their own kids.

Harriet Harman has family law blood on her hands, she knows what has happened to millions of UK kids, and how the mental suffering caused and being caused to UK kids and the parents who lose their children if affecting the nations hearts and minds.

As Bob Geldof said recently on the BBC, it is evil and barbaric what Harriet Harman and Jack Straw have allowed to happen in the name of family law.
Hope
 
Posts: 328
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 8:32 pm

Re: Massive abuse of power going on ???

Postby Hope » Sun Mar 21, 2010 11:46 pm

Bill Maloney – Award Winning Film Producer presents

St Peter's Child Abuse Advert
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9cgmS0eHsg
Hope
 
Posts: 328
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 8:32 pm

Re: Massive abuse of power going on ???

Postby Hope » Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:57 pm

Hope
 
Posts: 328
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 8:32 pm

Re: Massive abuse of power going on ???

Postby Hope » Thu Apr 08, 2010 10:05 am

http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2010/apr/01/baby-p-abuse-children-care-statistics?showallcomments=true#end-of-comments

Data summary
Children who became the subject of a Child Protection Plan, by category of abuseClick heading to sort. Year ending 31 March 2009
ID Place Reg All Neglect Phys abuse Sex. abuse Emot'l abuse Multiple / not rec
SOURCE: DCSF
1 ENGLAND Total 37900 16900 5800 2200 9700 3300
2 NORTH EAST NE 2535 1320 530 135 335 215
3 Darlington NE 120 70 45 10 0
4 Durham NE 345 165 60 25 35 55
5 Gateshead NE 120 65 20 10 25 0
6 Hartlepool NE 100 75 10 5 10 0
7 Middlesbrough NE 255 115 95 10 30 0
8 Newcastle upon Tyne NE 340 175 75 15 70 5
9 North Tyneside NE 160 100 30 25 0
10 Northumberland NE 220 95 70 10 25 25
11 Redcar and Cleveland NE 175 90 40 10 25 10
12 South Tyneside NE 160 120 10 5 10 20
13 Stockton-on-Tees NE 235 85 30 5 15 100
14 Sunderland NE 300 175 50 30 50 0
15 NORTH WEST NW 6045 2580 1095 375 1640 355
16 Blackburn with Darwen NW 170 95 15 40 10
17 Blackpool NW 245 105 30 15 90
18 Bolton NW 270 110 60 25 75 0
19 Bury NW 175 30 20 20 80 25
20 Cheshire NW 280 160 40 15 60 0
21 Cumbria NW 290 175 30 10 10 70
22 Halton NW 105 45 25 30 0
23 Knowsley NW 130 30 10 80 10
24 Lancashire NW 775 400 95 65 215 0
25 Liverpool NW 560 250 120 15 170 10
26 Manchester NW 610 340 110 15 95 45
27 Oldham NW 275 95 20 10 40 110
28 Rochdale NW 205 85 25 10 20 65
29 Salford NW 240 80 45 20 95 0
30 Sefton NW 260 95 110 15 40 0
31 St Helens NW 175 60 50 20 45 0
32 Stockport NW 195 65 30 15 85 0
33 Tameside NW 215 100 40 20 55 0
34 Trafford NW 190 35 45 15 95 0
35 Warrington NW 125 15 25 5 80 0
36 Wigan NW 285 125 30 30 95 0
37 Wirral NW 275 80 115 30 35 15
38 YORKS & THE HUMBER Y&H 3485 1345 655 260 850 380
39 Barnsley Y&H 170 45 35 25 55 10
40 Bradford Y&H 290 140 60 15 70 5
41 Calderdale Y&H 165 80 20 10 30 30
42 Doncaster Y&H 340 125 75 25 40 70
43 East Riding of Yorkshire Y&H 120 35 25 10 50 0
44 Kingston Upon Hull, City of Y&H 180 35 80 20 35 15
45 Kirklees Y&H 215 75 15 15 40 70
46 Leeds Y&H 395 105 100 45 145 0
47 North East Lincolnshire Y&H 60 30 15 10 0
48 North Lincolnshire Y&H 115 10 30 10 45 25
49 North Yorkshire Y&H 265 100 35 25 60 50
50 Rotherham Y&H 320 175 50 20 50 25
51 Sheffield Y&H 395 160 30 10 135 60
52 Wakefield Y&H 325 170 80 15 60 0
53 York Y&H 135 60 10 10 30 20
54 EAST MIDLANDS E Mids 2765 1020 420 165 675 485
55 Derby E Mids 160 50 20 20 75 0
56 Derbyshire E Mids 570 220 55 35 260 0
57 Leicester E Mids 430 135 180 25 35 60
58 Leicestershire E Mids 230 45 35 20 25 110
59 Lincolnshire E Mids 285 100 40 20 90 35
60 Northamptonshire E Mids 300 120 15 55 105
61 Nottingham E Mids 300 165 40 10 85 0
62 Nottinghamshire E Mids 480 185 50 25 50 170
63 Rutland E Mids 15 0 0 10
64 WEST MIDLANDS W Mids 4860 2175 755 280 1370 280
65 Birmingham W Mids 1600 685 300 80 490 45
66 Coventry W Mids 310 155 40 20 95 0
67 Dudley W Mids 235 125 55 15 35 15
68 Herefordshire W Mids 125 60 15 0 40 15
69 Sandwell W Mids 195 100 35 30 25
70 Shropshire W Mids 175 65 20 20 70 0
71 Solihull W Mids 130 65 10 50 5
72 Staffordshire W Mids 515 245 55 40 160 20
73 Stoke-on-Trent W Mids 250 95 25 30 95
74 Telford and Wrekin W Mids 155 80 40 40 0
75 Walsall W Mids 255 135 35 10 75 0
76 Warwickshire W Mids 350 115 35 25 35 145
77 Wolverhampton W Mids 205 115 35 10 40 0
78 Worcestershire W Mids 365 145 55 25 125 15
79 EAST OF ENGLAND E 3605 1840 425 175 725 440
80 Bedfordshire E 235 105 45 25 60 0
81 Cambridgeshire E 410 145 15 5 40 205
82 Essex E 795 440 140 30 100 85
83 Hertfordshire E 600 325 25 10 175 65
84 Luton E 175 80 20 15 45 15
85 Norfolk E 475 275 40 30 105 20
86 Peterborough E 145 70 20 15 10 30
87 Southend-on-Sea E 150 110 10 35 0
88 Suffolk E 495 240 90 30 135 0
89 Thurrock E 125 55 30 5 15 15
90 LONDON Lon 6095 2885 750 230 1780 445
91 Barking and Dagenham Lon 225 105 20 90
92 Barnet Lon 185 85 20 10 70
93 Bexley Lon 85 50 10 20 5
94 Brent Lon 205 60 30 20 75 25
95 Bromley Lon 180 75 10 70 20
96 Camden Lon 270 110 20 140 0
97 City of London Lon 0 0 0
98 Croydon Lon 290 160 40 15 50 25
99 Ealing Lon 330 160 30 10 115 5
100 Enfield Lon 225 125 15 10 60 15
101 Greenwich Lon 280 150 20 20 90
102 Hackney Lon 225 130 20 10 25 45
103 Hammersmith and Fulham Lon 160 65 30 40 25
104 Haringey Lon 160 35 20 0 40 65
105 Harrow Lon 170 120 20 30 0
106 Havering Lon 110 35 40 30 0
107 Hillingdon Lon 190 80 5 20 50 40
108 Hounslow Lon 220 100 45 10 65 0
109 Islington Lon 155 85 10 55 0
110 Kensington and Chelsea Lon 115 70 10 35 0
111 Kingston upon Thames Lon 90 50 10 5 25
112 Lambeth Lon 245 160 20 15 45 10
113 Lewisham Lon 185 100 20 15 40 10
114 Merton Lon 130 65 15 0 50 0
115 Newham Lon 270 135 50 10 75 0
116 Redbridge Lon 165 55 25 0 30 55
117 Richmond upon Thames Lon 45 10 5 15 10
118 Southwark Lon 330 170 30 10 80 40
119 Sutton Lon 165 100 10 50 0
120 Tower Hamlets Lon 205 50 40 10 100 5
121 Waltham Forest Lon 165 80 20 10 55
122 Wandsworth Lon 165 70 55 10 25
123 Westminster Lon 150 40 30 45 25
124 SOUTH EAST SE 5330 2570 690 335 1380 350
125 Bracknell Forest SE 55 20 10 25
126 Brighton and Hove SE 305 160 20 15 115
127 Buckinghamshire SE 275 125 25 65 55
128 East Sussex SE 465 180 55 40 195 0
129 Hampshire SE 640 365 160 60 55 0
130 Isle of Wight SE 145 45 15 5 75 0
131 Kent SE 900 395 140 50 270 50
132 Medway SE 200 115 15 40 30 0
133 Milton Keynes SE 80 30 5 10 5 30
134 Oxfordshire SE 260 95 25 5 75 55
135 Portsmouth SE 270 150 20 10 85 0
136 Reading SE 160 115 35
137 Slough SE 175 95 20 15 40
138 Southampton SE 180 55 30 25 20 50
139 Surrey SE 480 310 40 35 55 35
140 West Berkshire SE 85 30 15 5 35 0
141 West Sussex SE 460 190 45 15 140 70
142 Windsor and Maidenhead SE 100 60 10 30 0
143 Wokingham SE 95 30 25 0 40 0
144 SOUTH WEST SW 3175 1205 465 220 895 390
145 Bath and North East Somerset SW 65 25 5 0 35 0
146 Bournemouth SW 140 70 15 20 40 0
147 Bristol, City of SW 380 135 55 35 155 0
148 Cornwall SW 410 115 40 25 55 175
149 Devon SW 395 190 100 20 85 0
150 Dorset SW 235 75 25 40 95 0
151 Gloucestershire SW 270 115 10 5 35 105
152 Isles of Scilly SW 0 0 0 0 0 0
153 North Somerset SW 150 55 30 60
154 Plymouth SW 235 100 65 30 40 0
155 Poole SW 100 45 10 35 0
156 Somerset SW 235 55 20 10 55 90
157 South Gloucestershire SW 170 55 35 10 70 0
158 Swindon SW 140 80 10 20 25
159 Torbay SW 90 40 10 30 0
160 Wiltshire SW 165 50 30 10 75 0
Hope
 
Posts: 328
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 8:32 pm

Previous

Return to Freedom of Information only

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests