Patrick Cullinane's Story

[Veronica]

British planned to deport Irish by force in 1972 (including as much genocide as necessary)
Irish-American - December 2008
Irish-American - September 2009

[MikeThomas]

That's really pissed me off! Hypocritical, lying bastards & thieves! The lot of 'em!

[Jim]

HUMAN RIGHTS are not respected by the Crown gov’t. British subjects cannot demand their fundamental rights because the British Human Rights Act of 1998 excludes Article 1 by falsely claiming it is not actionable due to being merely introductory. The excluded Article 1 is of the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms to which Britain is a High Contracting Party as treaty signatory. Article 1 is perfectly clear. It reads; “The High Contracting Parties shall secure to everyone within their jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in Section 1 of this Convention.” That is what Britain insists upon violating.

Shocking. I'm shocked

[Jim]

“The High Contracting Parties shall secure to everyone within their jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in Section 1 of this Convention.” This is what Britain insists upon violating

Lucky I'm not under their jurisdiction then isn't it?

[Farmer]

In my eyes, planning something and implementing it are two different things. It is no different to making plans to rob a bank and then deciding not to. It's not a crime.

What is a crime is MI5 having one of their own people as one of the top three controlling the IRA and allowing people in Northern Ireland and in Britain to be bombed and murdered in other ways.

[enegiss]

hi farmer, i think it is a crime even though it wasnt commited it was still thought of and is therefore a conspiracy between cognizant parties to cause harm it just wasnt implemented? peace

[Farmer]

hi farmer, i think it is a crime even though it wasnt commited it was still thought of and is therefore a conspiracy between cognizant parties to cause harm it just wasnt implemented? peace

So in your view, thinking and planning to physically hurt your neighbour by beating him up because you don't like the dog barking all day is a crime, even though the act itself will never be carried out because that person has second thoughts about it and understand the repercussions if he does do it.

My question to you then is: under common law, who is the injured party?

[kevin]

beware of the thought police