by pooky2483 » Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:36 pm
I know the Notice's are based upon a Demand for unpaid or outstanding Bills/Balances. What I am doing is, I want to send the utility companies edited versions of the Notice where I am ceasing to pay these demands until the requirements in the Notice are fulfilled.
I have also sent off my Oath to one of the Barons who envoked Article 61 of The Magna Carta, along with notices to The PM, Derbyshire Chief of Police, Derbyshire Police & Crime Commissioner, Derby City Council & my local Councillor.
The current version of the (Veronicas) Notice...
Sections to edit are in BOLD
Dear Sirs,
Notice of Agreement of Offer and Request for Clarification.
Please read the following notice thoroughly and carefully before responding. It is a notice. It informs you. It means what it says.
The reason why you need to read carefully is simple. I am offering agreement. This removes controversy, and means that you no longer have any ultimate recourse to a court of law in this matter, because there is no controversy upon which it could adjudicate. The agreement is conditional. You always have the option of dragging these conditions into a court of law only to be told that they are, indeed, perfectly lawful. That is, of course, always your prerogative should you decide to waste your time.
For this reason it is important that you consider and respond to the offer in substance. The 'nearest official form' will not suffice, neither will an automated or standard reply, and consequently any such is likely to be ignored by myself without any dishonour on my part.
On the other hand there is a time-limit on the agreement being offered. It is reasonable, and if it runs out then you and all associated parties are in default, removing any and all lawful excuse on your part for proceeding in this matter.
For these reasons it is recommended that you carefully consider this notice and respond in substance.
You have apparently made demands upon me.
I do not understand those apparent demands and therefore cannot lawfully fulfil them.
I seek clarification of your document so that I may act according to the law-of-the-land and maintain my entire body of inalienable Natural Rights.
I conditionally accept your offer to agree that I am the legal fiction person VERONICA CHAPMAN to whom your paperwork was addressed, and that I owe £606.25, upon proof of claim of all of the following:
1. Upon proof of claim that I am a legal fiction person, and not a human being.
2. Upon proof of claim that you know what a 'person' actually is in legal terms.
3. Upon proof of claim that you know what the difference between a human being with a living soul and a legal fiction person actually is, in legal terms.
4. Upon proof of claim that you fully understand the difference between 'legal' and 'lawful'.
5. Upon proof of claim that I am legal fiction person VERONICA CHAPMAN, to whom your demand was addressed, and not human being with a living soul commonly called Veronica: of the Chapman family.
6. Upon proof of claim that your demand was the result of a lawful investigation unmarred by prejudice.
7. Upon proof of claim that I showed you some sort of identification.
8. Upon proof of claim that I am a member of the society whose statutes and subsisting regulations you are employing in order to create your demand.
9. Upon proof of claim that there is a nameable society that I belong to, and that the legislated rules of said society covering your demand state that they apply to My Self within that named society.
10. Upon proof of claim that there is a lawfully-binding contract between your company and My Self, comprising FULL DISCLOSURE by both parties, some equally-agreed CONSIDERATION offered by both parties, a set of lawful TERMS & CONDITIONS to which both parties agree, and a handwritten SIGNATURE by both parties (or lawful representative of either party).
In the case of Thames Water, the only CONSIDERATION I would be prepared to accept would be the service of providing My Human Self with clean, healthy, fresh drinking water, free of all toxic substances, and that Thames Water should be prepared to prove the condition of the water to My Satisfaction upon reasonable demand. (I repeat, MY SATISFACTION does not mean yours, nor does it mean anyone else's. I am the one who has to drink your sludge).
The CONSIDERATION I would offer on my part would be to pay for this service. However the amount payable by My Human Self would, by necessity, be fixed by the contract, since variable amounts (uncertain amounts) void any contract in law.
In the circumstance where you may be unable to produce sight of such a contract at this time, please feel free to offer me one under the conditions described above, and I will consider it.
Failure to accept this offer to clarify and to do so completely and in good faith within (fourteen) 14 days will be deemed by all parties to mean you and your principal or other parties abandon all demands upon My Human Self, Veronica: of the Chapman family, and/or the legal fiction person VERONICA CHAPMAN, voiding any and all future offers, and creating a lawfully permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiesce for evermore. Consequent to this I would not be in dishonour by ignoring any and all future demands you may care to send, since they would have no substance in law.
(Check this with your Lawyers, making sure they have a good Law Dictionary to hand, one that comprehensively covers Common Law as well as Contract Law).
This is My Truth, and My Law.
And, furthermore, if you think that you have to right to cut off such water as I do receive, you do not. For the simple reason that it would constitute a death sentence, and I have done nothing unlawful such as to have such a sentence passed upon My Human Self by any court of law. Furthermore capital punishment was anyway abolished in 1967 in a Bill sponsored by Sidney Silverman, MP and passed by Parliament.
Yours sincerely, without vexation, ill-will, or frivolity,
Veronica: of the Chapman family.
WITHOUT PREJUDICE, i.e. all Natural Rights Reserved.
This is a Notice which XXXX wrote to the Courts, again, it needs editing as I need to send it to the Utility Companies.
Lawful Rebellion Notice of Conditional Acceptance for court decision warrant of arrest, contempt of court, water bills.
This is the letter that began this process. Danielle DeLioness (A very naughty rebel) had ignored the first two summonses (which I don't advise) and received this sentence for contempt of court.
From: Mr. Markey
HMRC & Tribunals Service
Yeovil County Court
The Law Courts
Petters way
Yeovil
BA20 1SW
URGENT
CONTACT: COUNTY COURT YEOVIL
Case number 3JA10324
WARRANT OF ARREST FOR Mrs. Danielle Delioness
FAILURE TO ATTEND COURT WHEN ORDERED TO DO SO.
YOU HAVE BEEN SENTENCED TO 7 DAYS IN HMP Eastwood park....FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT.
To prevent loss of liberty and the embarrassment of a Police officer/Enforcement officer arresting you, you are strongly advised to contact
YEOVIL COUNTY COURT
WITHIN THE NEXT 48 HOURS
FAILURE TO DO SO WILL RESULT IN YOU BEING ARRESTED.
Mr. Markey
County Court Agent
Yeovil County Court
Tel........
Danielle, being a very naughty rebel indeed, decided she didn't want to consent to 7 days in prison. She was advised to contact Mr. Markey to give her just a little more time to draft the following Notice and serve it to begin the rebuttal process, which she did.
Being a sweet talker she convinced Mr. Markey that she needed a couple of weeks to convene a meeting with the so called court in Yeovil.....instead she wrote and served this up:
To : Mr. Markey (doing business as Court Enforcement Agent).
Yeovil County Court
The Law Courts
Pelllers Way
Yeovil
BA20 1SW
From: Danielle...
Address.....
Case reference number 3JA10324
Date Notice served: 20th January 2015.
Sent by special delivery.
NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE.
Notice to agent is notice to principle, Notice to principle is notice to agent
Dear Mr. Markey,
I am writing to you after receiving a letter of arrest and imprisonment for seven days for contempt of court.
Whereas I, Danielle Delioness do Not consent to the presumed jurisdiction of Yeovil County Court nor does your service have jurisdiction to lawfully carry out an arrest warrant for contempt of court whilst the invocation of Article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 is in effect and, that I Danielle Delioness (the living woman), stand fully behind the committee of the Barons whom invoked said article, which is the constitutional duty of ALL British subjects at this time. Not to do so would be ancillary to treason, therefore, enforcement of the detainment of Danielle Delioness would be an act of unlawful kidnap at common law.
Any hearing must be conducted in a properly convened Court de Jure so that justice can be seen to be done. I demand remedy under due process of law where constitutional law is fully observed.
Please be aware that this is a 'Notice of conditional acceptance' it informs you and means what it says. The matter raised herein is of a very serious nature and requires your immediate and urgent response.
Please also be aware that the fact that this 'Notice of conditional acceptance' is hand written does Not detract its validity under the common law. This document may be used as evidence in my defense.
Definition of a Notice:
A person has notice of a fact if he knows the fact has reason to know it, or has been given notification of it.
A reply in full to this notice is required within five (5) days from receipt of it.
Failure to reply to this Notice in 'substance' (meaning to respond to the points raised) shall be deemed to mean that they/you are in full agreement with all the points of law raised herein and, that no further actions will be taken against I Danielle Delioness nor the legal fiction that I lawfully reject to represent and, that I have 'lawful excuse' to do so.
Whereas you may be in ignorance of the evidential, thus provable fact that Article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 was invoked according to the correct protocols of British Constitutional Law on the 23rd day of March 2001 and, which stands to this day as the political position of the British Isles and Commonwealth.
TAKE NOTICE THAT: This fact was reported in the Daily Telegraph by Caroline Davies on the 24th March 2001 and can be seen online under the title of 'peers petition Queen on Europe' and, that we are all responsible 'individually' to comply with the law and that there is No defense in law by pleading ignorance.
It is the common law duty of all British subjects to defend the Common Law and to stand under article 61 when it has been invoked. Therefore;
1. I conditionally accept that Yeovil County Court has the authority to carry out its threats against me and, that I have a lawful obligation to comply to its orders on proof being provided, in substance, and within the reasonable time allotted, that Yeovil County Court and 'HM courts and tribunals service', can lawfully make such demands whilst article 61 of Magna Carta is currently in effect.
2. That Yeovil County Court is functioning under the constraints of the British Constitution and that the Crown has any authority whatsoever in these treacherous times.
I Danielle Delioness do have 'lawful excuse' to reject, distress and rebel peacefully and entirely lawfully under the protection of Constitutional law. Anyone who would seek to deprive me of due process under constitutional law will be committing a very serious offence indeed.
Mr. Markey, I urge you strongly to investigate the facts referred to herein. I do urge you to stand in defense of the British Constitution and under Article 61 yourself.
Without malice, frivolity or ill will, with all my inalienable Rights reserved and, on my full commercial liability and penalty of perjury.
Any response is required to be made on penalty of perjury and on your personal commercial liability.
Signature
Printed name
(Three Signatory witnesses and dated)
Witnessed by:
1 David Robinson: Signature, Date.
2
3