For Newbies, as much as anybody ...

I’m breaking this Topic up into segments, so that you don’t get overwhelmed.
I will try to ensure that it is suitable for Newbies, as much as anyone else.
FMOTL is now just over 1 year old. And we have learned a hell of a lot in that year.
One of the fundamental things we have learned – any many, many Members here will vouch for this – is that those we are up against (Police, Bailiffs, Debt Collectors, Magistrates, Clerks of Courts) find it (a) impossible to perform the simple act of reading, (b) impossible to perform the simple act of writing, (c) have the comprehension skills of a lamp post.
It doesn’t matter what you say, or do, they will not understand. Consequently it doesn’t matter what you say or do.
Thus you are free to do whatever is necessary (I’ll come to that).
It doesn’t matter whether you open their letters or not. Thus any “Return to Sender Campaign” doesn’t really go anywhere (ultimately). It may work – to some extent – but it is not the panacea for everything.
We’ve now, in the past year, been through the stage of “trying to ensure that we don’t Contract” … but they don’t understand what a Contract is … so why bother? Why worry?
So my message to Newbies is this: “Don’t worry about it”. Don’t even give it a second’s thought. At the end of the day, any Contract is only valid if it can be shown that YOU FULLY INTENDED TO CONTRACT, WITHOUT DECEPTION, AND NOT UNDER DURESS … so that means any & every so-called Contract isn’t worth the paper it is written on.
I missed out Judges from the list of so-called ‘officials’, above. Most of them do fit that category, but there are a few who do not. But none of them are a problem, as you’ll see if you read on.
I will try to ensure that it is suitable for Newbies, as much as anyone else.
FMOTL is now just over 1 year old. And we have learned a hell of a lot in that year.
One of the fundamental things we have learned – any many, many Members here will vouch for this – is that those we are up against (Police, Bailiffs, Debt Collectors, Magistrates, Clerks of Courts) find it (a) impossible to perform the simple act of reading, (b) impossible to perform the simple act of writing, (c) have the comprehension skills of a lamp post.
It doesn’t matter what you say, or do, they will not understand. Consequently it doesn’t matter what you say or do.
Thus you are free to do whatever is necessary (I’ll come to that).
It doesn’t matter whether you open their letters or not. Thus any “Return to Sender Campaign” doesn’t really go anywhere (ultimately). It may work – to some extent – but it is not the panacea for everything.
We’ve now, in the past year, been through the stage of “trying to ensure that we don’t Contract” … but they don’t understand what a Contract is … so why bother? Why worry?
So my message to Newbies is this: “Don’t worry about it”. Don’t even give it a second’s thought. At the end of the day, any Contract is only valid if it can be shown that YOU FULLY INTENDED TO CONTRACT, WITHOUT DECEPTION, AND NOT UNDER DURESS … so that means any & every so-called Contract isn’t worth the paper it is written on.
I missed out Judges from the list of so-called ‘officials’, above. Most of them do fit that category, but there are a few who do not. But none of them are a problem, as you’ll see if you read on.