Dear Sirs,
I write in response of your letter of the… yada …
It seem to suggest that you paid off some alleged debt to … yada … on my behalf.
It seems you expect me to pay you back. Unfortunately, however, your expectation is not going to be fulfilled for the following reasons:
1. Before involving yourselves, you failed to check that the so-called amount was actually owed. (It wasn’t)
2. That I, myself, am the debtor. (I’m not)
3. That I, myself, agreed to pay you back. (I didn’t)
4. That you are anyway attempting to take the piss, because your actual outlay would have 10%, or less, than your demand to me.
You need to make the most of this reply, because it is all you are going to get. You have now been told the situation in the plainest of English, I therefore intend to shred any further communications from you (however ‘dramatic’ you care make them. You are going to have to come to terms with the fact that your psychology no longer works).
Moral: If you go around paying off other people’s debts, make sure that you have an agreement with them BEFOREHAND. That is the accepted rule of good faith and civilised behaviour. It's also basic Common Sense - being the same thing as having a good look around first - before you jump into the water - only to discover there are sharks swimming around. Because once you've jumped ... it's a bit too late to discover the sharks.
Sincerely without frivolity,
X: of the Y family (as commonly called), English(Welsh/Scottish/Irish/etc) Sovereign.
Without any admission of any liability whatsoever, and with all Natural Indefeasible, Rights reserved.
Tuesday, 23 March 2010.NOTICE OF CUNTISHNESS & CONSEQUENT FEE SCHEDULE
Dear Sirs,
I write in response to your letter of 18/03/2010.
Even the Bills of Exchange Act, 1882 says that - once a debt is paid - said debt is extinguished.
Thus when Fredericksons paid Thames Water for some so-called ‘debt’ … said so-called ‘debt’ was extinguished. (FACT)
Consequently your letter doesn’t make any sense at all, in point of fact it is total bollox. You have your head totally up your arse for the following reasons:
1. I recall NO CONTRACT with you.
2. I recall NO CONTRACT with Fredericksons.
3. I recall NO CONTRACT with Thames Water.
4. I will NOT GRANT Contract to any Court de facto, should anyone decide to go to litigation. And, anyway, you will be wasting your time because there is no dispute, as explained above. There is only the FACT that any so-called ‘debt’ was extinguished.
So you are, basically, stuffed. And, that being the case, you must be a complete wanker to have even considered writing to me, because you should have checked all this out before putting electronic pen to paper.
Fredericksons have no right to pursue anyone for a non-existent so-called ‘debt’, and only a complete twat would conjoin with them in such a CRIMINAL activity of attempted:
FRAUD/BLACKMAIL/EXTORTION/RACKETEERING
(Call it what you will).
Perhaps you could redeem your blatant cuntishness by explaining it to them nicely?
Maybe you should take some LAWFUL advice? It is, after all, childishly simple. It goes like this. If you intend to pay off someone else’s debt, make sure – beforehand – that they have agreed, via BINDING CONTRACT, to pay you back. Otherwise it is rather stupid to go ahead and do it. (And even more stupid to conjoin with them). Unless, of course, you are all philanthropists … but you don’t sound like that.
This is so simple, and basic, that anyone who did not comprehend would need to be mentally retarded. It is the basis of good faith and civilised behaviour, and forms a part of the bedrock of the Law-of-the-LAND (aka the Common Law). (So now you know).
[b]I hereby send you Notice that my fee for any further responses in this matter (which constitute unwarranted intrusions into my privacy, and attempts at trespass on my sovereignty) will be £1,000 per letter (irrespective of content), and that by sending me a communication, you accept said Fee Schedule.[/b]
So, make the most of this response, and the education contained herein, because it is all you and/or Fredericksons are likely to get from me.
Sincerely without frivolity,
Veronica: of the Chapman family, as commonly called (English Sovereign). Without any admission of any liability whatsoever, and with all Natural Indefeasible Rights reserved.
TO WHOEVER IT MAY CONCERN:Notice to Bailiffs & Debt Collectors (etc)Notice to Agent is notice to Principal; Notice to Principal is notice to Agent
It is a basic rule of Common Sense that – if you pay someone else’s so-called ‘debt’ - then you make sure – BEFOREHAND – that they are prepared to pay you back. If you had done that, your demands would have the force of LAW behind them.
Since you never checked anything with me BEFOREHAND, then you & your Company are either:
1. Philanthropists, acting non-philanthropic
OR
2. A collection of mentally retarded wankers, devoid of basic Common Sense/comprehension of LAW.
Don’t bother knocking, because you’ll be unlikely to get an answer. If you do get an answer, then the only one you’ll get will be “Fuck off you pathetic little wanker” … so you’ll be wasting your time.
If you put a letter through the door it will be immediately shredded. Yet another waste of your time & effort … but hey … you’re a complete wanker … so you’ll do it anyway!
THE REASON IS VERY SIMPLE: DON’T BUY DEBTS BEFORE ESTABLISHING FIRST OF ALL, THAT YOU’LL GET PAID BACK … OTHERWISE YOU AREA STUPID FUCKING WANKER.(By all means take a copy of this Notice back to your office)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests