Here are hour 1 and 2 of the 11th April 2010 show which details phase 2 of the plan:
http://www.zshare.net/download/748717418958fba3
Ladies and gentlemen,
Thank you for all of the positive feedback regarding last night’s reading of the Manifesto of Rights in Law; Bill of Containment.
On the wonderful suggestion of Clive Boustred, leader of CopperCards, the first major organization to throw its support to The Restore America Plan and who kindly provided the official Plan website on short notice at www.TheRestoreAmericaPlan.com, I am RE-writing Article 9 of the Manifesto to restrict the issuance of ALL warrants for search, seizure or arrest to duly seated grand juries of competent jurisdiction on the land, rather than judges, pursuant to language in the Fifth Article of Amendment to the Constitution for the United States which reads:
“No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”
As often happens, it took a moment to un-learn years of brainwashing and tradition. But shortly after reading Clive's email, it was clear to me that the power to invade one’s home does not belong in the hands of individuals, just as the power to ruin one’s life with an indictment belongs in the hands of a grand jury.
Here is the new Manifesto language:
“Article 9. Pursuant to the Fifth Article of Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America, circa 1787, and respecting the power to invade a home or business shall never again be seated in the hands of any singular individual, any and all warrants to detain any member of the sovereign People or to search his or her home, business, banking records or any records maintained on his or her behalf, or to seize items, freeholdings, property or any interest(s) thereof shall be issued only by a lawful grand jury of competent jurisdiction duly assembled on the land, and only upon a sworn affidavit, solemn affirmation or solemn testimony of the injured party having first hand knowledge of the specific allegations rather than information and belief, or by an agent for such party having such first hand knowledge if the injured party is incapacitated, and sworn affidavit, solemn affirmation or solemn testimony of two witnesses to the alleged crimes having first hand knowledge thereof, or if such witnesses not be available, upon due consideration of all, not some, of the available facts and evidence, with the exception that in the case of reasonable belief of imminent threat to life, a judge of a court of competent jurisdiction on the land may issue a warrant to enter for the sole purpose of preventing such loss of life. No warrant shall be executed without exhibition of the warrant to, and opportunity for examination by, the intended party other than in the event of imminent threat to life; trespass on divine rights being eternally valued above the need for evidentiary gathering by the state. Defects in a warrant render it instantly void; and all efforts to execute such a void trespass shall comprise a tort, assault and other crimes which would normally apply to similar behavior conducted without the veil of color of law. The use of all necessary force to repel such void warrant is recognized as a divine right to each member of the Sovereign people, and without fear of prosecution or criminal liability. It is a self-confessed tort, and the high crime of enticement into slavery, for anyone to prosecute such lawful invocation of the divine right of self-preservation, and any such attempt shall waive all of the offender’s rights of protest, objection and appeal. Hereafter, the term “due process” in the Fifth Article of Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America, circa 1787 shall be defined as stated in this Article, thereby ending forever all speculation and profit-generation by the “legal” franchise regarding this non-issue.”
Thank you, Clive, for the insight. It is a shame that so many words are required to re-state the obvious fact that the state has no premise for invading our homes other than bona fide evidence that we are engaged in behavior harmful to our neighbors.
As I mentioned last night, I intend the Manfesto to be an epochal document, one of the most important documents in the history of mankind. Not because I wrote it, but because it is the first time in history that all of the deceptions for enslaving the People under color law devised by the “legal” franchise and money predators have been exposed, contained and enforced as actionable self-confessed torts and crimes against mankind.
Thank you for reading and would you kindly consider CIRCULATING THIS EMAIL FAR AND WIDE?
Peace and Grace to all,
Sam Kennedy
www.guardiansofthefreerepublics.com
nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself (self incrimination).
The prosecutor asks "Please state your name for the record" or "Sir, you are Mr Jones"
I am more than prepared to answer your question, but did you just ask me to bear witness against myself to confess to being a distinct US legal fiction trust account entity which is named on the piece of paper you are holding - Yes or No for the record.
(the prosecutor will either try to trick his way around this or simply not answer it, if trickery is used repeat the question until he falls silent)
Let the record show that the prosecutor by his silence has been compelling me to bear witness against myself.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests