Major Development in the US

Re: Major Development in the US

Postby Farmer » Thu Feb 04, 2010 8:07 am

It appears that things are starting to take their course. It is also good to see in this latest email that they understand that people in the US may not take the same view about what is morally right:

To my friends, colleagues and the many thousands who have contacted the Guardian Elders by email and telephone:

YOU ARE NOT ALONE. Today I have the pleasure of reporting that thousands upon thousands of you have already joined the march to freedom by expressing your support for The Restore American Plan.

Moreover, the United States Federal Corporation is well aware. A number of my sources have confirmed their heightened state of attention to the freedom march that has swept across the land since Sunday night’s broadcast of TAKE NO PRISONERS clogged internet communications. That broadcast was akin to the battle of Bunker Hill in 1776. We lost the network for a few days, but everyone knows we're back. They understand the power AND AUTHORITY of the sovereign People when we choose, en masse, to reject the admiralty/territorial D.C. circuit for the Law of the Land. They understand that the only element that can prevent the reinhabitation of the de jure free American republics is fractionalization, ego, fatigue or selfishness. Those are the corporations best friends when confronted with truth. So we remain vigilant against the evil of our own imaginations, egos, anger and pessimism.

With thousands of you consumed with vision and hope, most of those who have contacted us thus far WILL NOT NEED TO TAKE FURTHER ACTION AT THIS TIME. You can literally sit back and await the changes that are coming, and be ready if we should contact you. There is NO need to resend your email. NO need for further education, information and training. NO need for seminars. NO need to study DVDs. NO need for assemblies to engage U.S. Inc. in thousands of separate battles. NO need to sit by the phone hoping for scraps from the table.

Better to enjoy your families and engage in prayerful contemplation of the future. Yes, some among you will bemoan the loss of the enslavement privileges, the loss of day to day control, even the loss of WHFITs!? But perhaps this is a good time to open the heart to the beauty of a reversal of the double-dealings of 1933 and the Warburg brothers, and NOT having to spend every waking moment in contemplation of battle with U.S. Inc. The changes WILL be forthcoming as described. There is only the need to enjoy the fruits of your own labor as de jure governance is re-inhabited by the very same officials in many cases who are now your oppressors. Just as judges and politicians accepted the elimination of law, money and morality in 1933 without a hint of public protest, we expect the reversal will be equally as quiet, and significant with respect to our daily lives.

The Restore America Plan is the strategic mechanism for restoring the lawful institutions of earthly government across the land lawfully, peacefully and honorably, in a manner that reflects the desire of the sovereign People to be governed by consent, according to contract, and without hypothecation of their God-given labor to money vultures, war profiteers and the world's secret banking cartels.

FOR THOSE OF YOU WITH GROUPS OF 25 LIKE-MINDED SOVEREIGNS ready to join, please send an email to TheRestoreAmericaPlan@gmail.com and note the subject line:

HAVE ENTIRE ASSEMBLY – Name of your republic

_______________


RATIONALE

For those who are concerned about opening the door to satanic forces, permit me to reassure you. The Guardian Elders deliberated with great sobriety the wisdom of sitting on our hands while the march to World War III continues. We asked ourselves if we could continue, in good conscience, to do nothing while so many of our friends and colleagues are suffering hardship. We asked ourselves if we are enjoined by the Book of Revelation from acting on behalf of freedom and mankind. After much prayer and soul-searching, we concluded unanimously that the need for action was self-evident. We are called to action.

We debated how best to accomplish our goals. Could we reasonably expect to restore Biblical law to a devoutly secular population that cherishes television, promiscuity, physical debasement and electronic devices with religious fervor, and that suffers the warped belief that advertisements for personal hygiene products and Viagra in our homes does not debase our children? Could we re-educate millions of Americans who have been programmed to believe that the ban against government interference in matters of worship somehow excludes piety in government? Could we convey consciousness regarding matters of Law to a society that breaths “Cops” and “Law & Order” and worships the bar associations “legal” system franchise where once the law of the Land reigned supreme? Eventually we concluded that “agreeing with thine enemy” was the ONLY prayerful way to bring the Lord to the people. The Restore America Plan capitalizes on THEIR belief system as a vehicle for relieving corporate tyranny. In due time, the higher goal of salvaging the souls of mankind can be addressed.

The one common belief that ties the American population together is faith in the Constitution. Many Americans are willing to fight and die in its defense even as they blindly trade notes of debt issued by a foreign bank. We decided that restoring, in principle, the Constitutional institutions through December 19, 1860 was the approach MOST LIKELY TO SUCCEED (and that's the bottom line, failure being unacceptable). We rejected restoration to 1933, the Articles of Confederation or ancient times as being insufficient (1933) or unworkable, at least in terms of achieving our goals rather than proclaiming our patriot knowledge of history. Of course we recognize that the Constitution was the method for imposing on the States the obligations rejected by the colonies to pay the Revolutionary War debts to the Bank of England. Notwithstanding, we can relieve the suffering of the sovereign People by agreeing with those who choose to glorify a man-made document.

And finally, we constructed “The unanimous Declaration of the sovereign People of the united States of America to restore and reinhabit the free American Republics” to be a shining covenant with the Creator. His charging the People with dominion over all the earth in the Book of Genesis is declared in the very first paragraph as the foundation for the restoration. In so doing, the Declaration is established in history as a genuine covenant with the Creator in honor of the Law.

Thus, once the process was grounded in the original law venue, the need to introduce the ethereal concepts of counties, districts and “tens” was circumvented, all of those entities being derived from Scripture. Why introduce concepts that are likely to generate resistance? At every step, The Restore America Plan is mindful of our goals. Is our goal to relieve oppression or re-educate America to patriot doctrine?

WE HAVE THE HIGHEST REGARD FOR THOSE OF YOU TRYING TO CARVE OUT SUCH LIVES ON THE county, but we believe that most patriots will be well served by a simultaneous restoration of their sovereign rights rather than fighting the battles town by town, county by county, and state by state. And so we welcome each and every one of you to join us

EVEN WHOLE ASSEMBLIES AND JURIES.

We also believe that if the American Founders had email, Twitter, texting, video conferencing and fax machines, they would have used them to approve the founding documents in weeks rather than years. So we are not addicted to scribes and other signs of deference to the methods of others. Rather, we follow a simple formula:

WE DECLARE – UNDER GOD – IT IS SO – WE ARE BACK

exactly the same formula used by the original declaration of 1776. That’s what we mean by “understanding who we are.”

_______________


IMMEDIATE GOALS

To be clear, the immediate goals of The Restore America Plan include:

- ending foreclosure and bank collection actions immediately (our first and seventh directives)
- ending tax prosecutions immediately (second and sixth directives)
- ending invasions, prosecutions and detentions for fictitious crimes against the state that lack an injured party other than insurrection, treason and frauds against the United States (third and eighth directives)
- ending molestation on the byways (fourth and ninth directives)
- production of sovereign identification and passports that do not proclaim subject-class citizenship (fourth and ninth directives)
- restoration of the trappings of proper de jure governance (fifth and tenth directives)
- restoration of the common law of the Land (third and eighth directives)
- reigning in of the admiralty color-of-law venue to the high seas (third and eighth directives)
- restoration of the proper de jure judicial institutions such as the district court of the United States and the one supreme Court as constructed and restrained in the Constitution for the United States of America, c. 1787 (Phase 2, thirteenth through fifteenth directives)
- re-absorption of the de facto judicial aberrations such as USDC into the de jure institutions (Phase 2, thirteenth through fifteenth directives)
- a PERMANENT TERMINATION OF TERRITORIAL GOVERNMENT OUTSIDE CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS beginning with voiding of the Downes v. Bidwell monstrosity (Phase 2, eighteenth directive)
- arrest and shackling of the District Court of the District of Columbia (Phase 2, sixteenth directive)
- recognition of sovereign status in the police databanks of the land (fourth and ninth directives)
- and a lawful and orderly removal of the corporate state as the ruler of every aspect of your life.

And we will accomplish all of that – with your help – BEHIND THE SCENES, lawfully, peacefully, without violence and without risking civil war.

_______________


RESTORATION OF THE PEOPLE’S COMMON LAW OF THE LAND

With restoration of the de jure judicial institutions in Phase 2, we are also enacting the:

Bill of Rights of Law

to prevent once and for all the “legal” franchise perversions of law into at-law, territorial, admiralty/military aberrations.

There will be no such entity as a non-Article III court, even when administering the admiralty law venue for genuine issues of the high seas and international commerce.

The Bill of Rights of Law has been authored to address the perversions of law through statutes, Rules of Evidence, and Rules of Civil Procedure which have hijacked the law of the Land for the bar associations and converted the common law grand juries into prosecutorial kingdoms and slandered them as “runaway juries” instead of the fourth branch of government historically charged with OVERSEEING GOVERNMENT and PROTECTING AGAINST TYRANNY BY GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS .

_______________


LAW ENFORCEMENT

Even the insidious law enforcement agencies that have become interwoven in the tiniest issues of our lives will see the benefits of a return to the land where they can once again devote their skills to enforcing law, forever spared the risks of acting as agents for tyranny and the tragedies of assaulting the women and children of the sovereign People, their own mothers, sisters, daughters and granddaughters.

_______________


INSPECTING THE DOCUMENTS

As mentioned yesterday, the final complete Declaration document will be available through the state and/or regional coordinators for inspection to preserve the integrity of the Plan. Many of the details of The Restore America Plan beyond what I’ve shared in this email are classified much as Eisenhower protected the details of the D-Day invasion. Our campaign to regain the world’s law is no less fraught with obstacles. In the meantime, I hope the robust information in this email is helpful.

Those who disdain such strategic planning need merely not participate or may seek out the document from a state coordinator. Folks, with apologies, we are not seeking to satisfy the craving every patriot. We are seeking a remedy on behalf of the thousands who have already responded.

_______________


JOINING

If you contacted me my own email address (Restore.America@hotmail.com) instead of at TheRestoreAmericaPlan@gmail.com, or

If you have not responded and wish to join

Please send an email to: TheRestoreAmericaPlan@gmail.com so your request is properly processed. Please mark the subject line as the case may be:

WISH TO JOIN – Name of your republic

WISH TO COORDINATE - Name of your republic, or

HAVE ENTIRE ASSEMBLY – Name of your republic

Again, THERE IS NO NEED TO SEND A SECOND EMAIL if you already responded properly. As mentioned, most of you will not need to take any action at all because the very act of convening, especially in the numbers that have appeared, is a self-actualizing remedy granting authority above the de facto actors and institutions.

_______________


SUNDAY NIGHT MEETING WITH TIM TURNER

The Republic Broadcasting Network is repaired and the facilities have been hardened against further problems in anticipation of this Sunday’s broadcast (February 7, 2010) of TAKE NO PRISONERS at 8 PM Eastern time, 7 PM Central time, 6 PM Mountain time and 5 PM Pacific time. I invite all of you to join the Guardian Elders for this momentous broadcast by listening ON THE INTERNET or through Shoutcast at:

http://republicbroadcasting.org

Please note that the call-in phone number listed at the Republic Broadcasting Network website is NOT for listening to the program, but for callers to ask questions and participate. The best way to listen is on the internet either at the RBN website or through Shoutcast. The Shoutcast app on iPhones and Blackberry’s is another way to listen live. Just search for Republic Broadcasting Network through the app.

Those of you who were waiting to hear Guardian Elder, Tim Turner, last Sunday, will not be disappointed next Sunday, Lord willing. He has returned from seminar and his voice should be fully repaired.

_______________


LINKS TO JAN. 31, 2010 BROADCAST

Here are some links to download both hours of a recording of last week’s broadcast provided by a listener. As time is of the essence, I hope you will give it a listen as soon as possible:

Hour 1:
http://www.zshare.net/audio/71969416ad804e00/

Hour 2:
http://www.zshare.net/audio/71969710b7fee8b0/

You can also download the broadcast or listen on the internet at:

http://republicbroadcasting.org

Or listen in real time at:

http://educationcenter2000.com/The Final Remedy_Sam Kennedy.htm



On behalf of the Guardian Elders, I thank you for reading, and ask if you would kindly circulate this email far and wide. Folks, the time for remedy is now.

God bless,

Sam Kennedy

______________


Dr. Sam Kennedy
Host: TAKE NO PRISONERS
Republic Broadcasting network
http://www.republicbroadcasting.org/
The Save America Crusade
FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY - NOT LEGAL ADVICE.
PLEASE BE CAUTIOUS. MOST PROBLEMS ARE SELF-CREATED.

If you're scared of 'them' poisoning 'us' with some shit then maybe you haven't noticed the shit they are already poisoning us with.
- prajna - fmotl.co.uk forum 2011
User avatar
Farmer
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 1989
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:07 am

Be careful of backing anyone without careful opposing study

Postby OneManAndHisDog » Thu Feb 04, 2010 7:55 pm

Thanks Farmer.

Also. Be careful of controlled opposition in a field like this. What is happening here is very big. I have studied this for some years and have many doubts about what Tim Turner is doing. Some of it just does not fit. Check it out for yourselves of course.

This is an area the established Powers would like to throw one of their "leaders" into so they can redirect it and make it mess up. Not always a leader they create, but also a "leader" they push over someone who is doing it the right way, by dissing the right way and encourage information to spread about the wrong way that will only cause trouble.

I'm not sure about it all though, but I would recommend people look at all the information before hand, spending months going over the Team Law Open Forum and teamlaw.org that have been coordinating it for many years, way before Tim Turner started, and looking at least at these two links and all links thereof for a deeper understanding...
o Confirm or deny Complete seating of OJ Government
o Freedom Documents

...the foundation of all this is knowing first about Trusts, the nature of Trusts, how Trusts and the duties thereunder come about, and so on.

I agree that some of what Tim Turner is doing is certainly not right and there is no basis for some parts of the "authority" he is claiming they have. Still, I haven't looked at this for about 2 years, so I'll have to study the latest information and who is doing what in particular.

As with any model, or theory you have, the biggest test is to go and seek out all opposing material and learn it to see if the picture you have formed in your mind can withstand the test. From this, find out why the differences exist and look only to deeper foundational reason and logic to find which is right.

Also, David Williams in "The Right of Self Determination" and his other work also expressed what is going on, though I can't find them anywhere online now.
OneManAndHisDog
 
Posts: 108
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 6:10 am

Re: Major Development in the US

Postby enegiss » Fri Feb 05, 2010 1:21 am

hi onemanandhisdog, team law? is it worth signing up, time is precious and study is hard, but i like the idea of learning the structure of thinking, law like. is it much the same as english law? they have a donation system, which seems resonable, to learn such things as law. what do you think? peace bruv
if you wish to create a favourable History, then you have to start now.
enegiss
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 1326
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 9:10 pm

Re: Major Development in the US

Postby OneManAndHisDog » Fri Feb 05, 2010 3:20 am

enegiss wrote:hi onemanandhisdog, team law? is it worth signing up, time is precious and study is hard, but i like the idea of learning the structure of thinking, law like. is it much the same as english law? they have a donation system, which seems resonable, to learn such things as law. what do you think? peace bruv

They have an Open Forum. So there's no need to sign up to anything at first. You can read over all the material on the forums (they are very strict on these forums, so certainly a very different attitude and you have to be ready for that sort of thing, I was put off at first, until I learned it separately on my own research then realized they were right). They encourage you to question everything and to go out and do research to either find out the same or to put a counter argument forward. This process builds up your ability to reason and build on logic.

Of course, this isn't the only resource to use, go to books on Trusts (Professor Sarah Wilson's book "Todd & Wilson's Textbook on Trusts" is a good intro, get the 9th Edition version for the impressive first chapter), and other law, and case law.

And the 1215.org site is a very good resource. See the Foundation page and the audio lectures.

Also, I find having a good grasp of grammar very useful in knowing law (I only started studying grammar after leaving uni), many people fail to grasp something because of their lack of knowledge of the correct use of grammar. Particularly the grasp of the use of proper nouns (including capitonyms), and the correct use of the tenses, though not limited to these two things.

Having a knowledge of proper nouns well tell you the difference between seeing the People written in a document and people, or the Family vs. family. Initial letter capitalized (proper noun, capitonym) is something specific, where non initial letter capitalized is the general word.

Having a knowledge of tense will also immediately give you knowledge of the difference between "includes" and "including". The tense "includes" is clearly immediately recognized as being either 2nd or 3rd person and either simple present, where it is complete, whereas the word "including" is any person and one of the progressive tenses, meaning the verb is progressing and so is not complete.

It includes A, B and C, means only A, B and C is in "it" and nothing more.
It is including A, B and C, means A, B and C is in "it" but as it is progressive, our list is not yet complete.

I learned this from I think a textbook for 12/13 year olds that was taught in the late 19th Century... when I was in my mid 20s no less, after leaving university.

(Learning the difference between "will" and "want" is good too, though not really found it useful with respect to law. When you remove all your want, there is only your will.)

Yup. If you've gone over everything or stuck on some things, then certainly sign up to their open forums and pose questions or counter argument.


Studying the US (and the Japanese, Chinese, Korean (indirectly with a translator), and more recently Irish) system has helped me more accurately know exactly what is occurring with the system here (in our collective minds on the British Isles) which is very obfuscated.

The US system is a pretty clean system and good for study (in comparison to the UK), and knowing this will help you to know the system here (which is more hidden).

Just before 4th July 1776, there was the Parliamentary system extending to the US and there were many corporations acting there including the East India Company under the Crown (the Executive Branch on the British Isles and the Commonwealth). The People there had unalienable rights at common law and also may have had duties under the Crown or its other corporation subject to the Statutes and Acts of Parliament, and perhaps duties under other private Trusts and private contracts.

Just after 4th July 1776, there was no Parliamentary Statutes and Acts that applied and no Crown to enforce it (though they still tried). The People there had unalienable rights at common law alone, and also only the duties they had taken on voluntarily (like private contracts and duties under private Trusts).

In a stroke of a pen - the declaration of 1776, in Trust (from re-presentation in a convention), one small group of men declared in a "Claim of Right" - the Declaration of Independence - that the Parliament (Legis.) the Crown (Exec.) and the Courts (Juris.) would no longer have power over the People as "subject". The People became free and sovereign.

The only courts that could continue were those courts that proceeded according to the common law - "courts of record" - and were only allowed to act in Maritime / Admiralty on the "officers" under the now-independent States.

By that time, equity (trusts) was already a part of common law of the People, as is reasonable. (See Professor Sarah Wilson's book.)

Later, they created their own Society called the United States of America by Constitution (a.k.a. Trust Document / Charter), whereby that Society was created in Trust (equity... being part of common law) on behalf of the People, with the People as the Beneficiary, and all public servants as the effective Trustees with fiduciary duty and oath of office under that Trust. The "officers" (public servants) were bound to operate in that office according to the Constitution, Bills and statutory Acts, later also to settle "charges" to its internal accounts according to the Codes.

Each Body's Constitution limits that Body it created (that it "provisioned") and so limits those agents / servants acting in its name. If they act outside of the powers granted to it by the Constitution, then they are overstepping their granted jurisdiction / authority.

The People, however, being sovereign and a Beneficiary of the Trust (the United States of America) had no such obligations under any Constitution, Bills or statutory Acts, as they stood at common law, unless they voluntarily took on a role and office under the United States of America to serve the People, or took an office under one of the States to serve the People (then being bound by that State's Constitution, Bills and statutory Acts).


With the British Isles though, things are a little more complicated.

The Magna Carta (Charter) was considered the basis of our Constitution, but does not provide for (provision / create) the Power on these lands. It only limits their power to stop them from infringing upon the unalienable rights of the free men <-- small "f", not a proper noun, therefore equivalent to "people", and heirs is almost equivalent to "posterity".

The Power was already present and occupying these lands since invading in 1066. The Crown is only one branch of the Power structure - the Executive Branch.

The Magna Carta, 1215, is a Charter by the people of these lands at common law to limit the Powers from infringing on the people.

Be sure not to confuse our Charter of 1215 that stops others from denying us our unalienable rights with the internal statute of 1297 called the Confirmatio Cartarum (incorrectly called the Magna Carta of 1297 that is an internal document to its created roles and officers to tell them to stop denying the people their unalienable rights). They can repeal the latter (the 1297 statute) and replace it with new 'Acts', but the first (Magna Carta, 1215) was a declaration by the people - a Claim of Right - and cannot be repealed by them because they didn't write it.

EDIT: --> "posterity" spelling, meaning "descendants". Not to be confused with with the word 'prosperity'.

( Registration of a right or property establishing it in Trust | Fundamentals of Trusts | Fundamentals of the common law etc. (1-5) )
Last edited by OneManAndHisDog on Thu Feb 11, 2010 7:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
OneManAndHisDog
 
Posts: 108
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 6:10 am

Re: Major Development in the US

Postby Farmer » Fri Feb 05, 2010 10:54 am

OneManAndHisDog wrote:They can repeal the latter (the 1297 statute) and replace it with new 'Acts', but the first (Magna Carta, 1215) was a declaration by the people - a Claim of Right - and cannot be repealed by them because they didn't write it.


This makes it very clear. So all the statutes that were passed over time to void some of the clauses are not valid. However, those statutes will still apply to say a council or military who will then ignore any of those clauses in the Magna Carta?
If you're scared of 'them' poisoning 'us' with some shit then maybe you haven't noticed the shit they are already poisoning us with.
- prajna - fmotl.co.uk forum 2011
User avatar
Farmer
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 1989
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:07 am

Re: Major Development in the US

Postby Farmer » Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:06 am

OneManAndHisDog wrote:It includes A, B and C, means only A, B and C is in "it" and nothing more.
It is including A, B and C, means A, B and C is in "it" but as it is progressive, our list is not yet complete.


I left school with very minimal reading and writing abilities. I taught myself after having left. I have never been taught correct grammar and have no idea what nouns are. I seem to manage ok, but clearly from what you have written I need to look into this. The strange thing is, I am able to read and write German without ever having learnt it. I could speak German because of my parents, but was never taught to read and write German here in the UK while in school.
If you're scared of 'them' poisoning 'us' with some shit then maybe you haven't noticed the shit they are already poisoning us with.
- prajna - fmotl.co.uk forum 2011
User avatar
Farmer
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 1989
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:07 am

Re: Major Development in the US

Postby enegiss » Fri Feb 05, 2010 1:48 pm

thanks 1mahd, ime with you farmer for the nouns and things, except the german language bit. but the site, wow, very interesting, thanks, peace, cant wait to get back for a read :grin:
if you wish to create a favourable History, then you have to start now.
enegiss
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 1326
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 9:10 pm

Re: Major Development in the US

Postby Farmer » Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:48 pm

In this weeks show more information was given as to what they are doing and how far the support for this has mushroomed:

http://www.guardiansofthefreerepublics.com

Hour 1: http://www.zshare.net/audio/72298066828bc2da

Hour 2: http://www.zshare.net/audio/7229821103998a50
If you're scared of 'them' poisoning 'us' with some shit then maybe you haven't noticed the shit they are already poisoning us with.
- prajna - fmotl.co.uk forum 2011
User avatar
Farmer
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 1989
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:07 am

Re: Major Development in the US

Postby enegiss » Mon Feb 08, 2010 4:06 pm

thanks farmer, very interesting init. peace
if you wish to create a favourable History, then you have to start now.
enegiss
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 1326
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 9:10 pm

Bills follow Orders. Trusts & Trustees carry out Bills.

Postby OneManAndHisDog » Thu Feb 11, 2010 9:22 pm

Farmer wrote:
OneManAndHisDog wrote:They can repeal the latter (the 1297 statute) and replace it with new 'Acts', but the first (Magna Carta, 1215) was a declaration by the people - a Claim of Right - and cannot be repealed by them because they didn't write it.


This makes it very clear. So all the statutes that were passed over time to void some of the clauses are not valid. However, those statutes will still apply to say a council or military who will then ignore any of those clauses in the Magna Carta?

Yup. The statutes are for managing the internal affairs of a Body / Society / Trust, i.e. for managing those that are subject to it / acting in its name.

The Body itself is often created by some kind of document; Charter / Constitution / Constituting Document / Trust Document / Trust Indenture / Covenant.

For example, a Company (the Body) may issue its own Statutes, Codes etc internal to that Body. It may even say in their law that "Everyone shall ..." or "No one shall ...", and by the use of "everyone" or "no one" they clearly only mean everyone that is under and subject to the Company, i.e. its employees. That is the limit of its jurisdiction / authority, - not "everyone" in the universe as this is way beyond their jurisdiction. If they tried applying their Company law to anyone, then they'd clearly be overstepping their jurisdiction and trespassing on your rights and freedoms, - you would challenge their jurisdiction and ask them to present a "proof of claim" that they have jurisdiction / authority over you.

Its jurisdiction may not even be limited by "land boundaries" that it owns, because jurisdiction acts on roles, such as by the employees, by acting on those conscious souls that stand as employees, thereby taking on a duty bound under the internal laws of the Body.

Take the example of a pizza company. On site on the property they own they can apply their Statutes / Codes (called "positive law") to their employees, but that's not all - its employees may go out and deliver pizzas, and even on common land and roads that the pizza company does not own an employee is still under the positive law (its statutes / codes) of the Company to which he is employed. The law applies to the person.

The person (natural person) is the human being's "inter-face" so that he may "inter-act" with others. When he "interacts" and "interfaces" with others, he is bound through his person at law by contract and trust through his actions and words, and even his inactions and silence depending on context.


In addition to the People giving notice by the Magna Carta, 1215, to the established Powers That Be that their already-existing un-a-lien-able rights shall not be infringed upon, they again gave notice by Declaration of Rights, 1688, - an "Order" by the People - to the Body entrusted (as a Trust) to uphold their rights and to not infringe or trespass upon the people's unalienable rights at common law.

This Declaration by the people was accepted much sooner this time by the Powers That Be as the "Bill of Rights", 1689. The Bill is on the Trust, specifically to be abided by the agents / servants of that Trust when in duty so as not to infringe on the unalienable rights of the people.

It is those that are acting as public servants that are bound by these documents when standing in that role and acting in the name of the established Powers. When standing on their own cognizance though (once they come home from work), they too are one of the people, and have their rights protected.

Just as the Confirmatio Cartarum of 1297 (that the Powers call the Magna Carta) is an implementation of the declared Claim of Right that is the Magna Carta, 1215, and the Confirmatio Cartarum has been repealed and updated by newer 'Acts', so long as they are still in line with the Magna Carta, 1215, then so too can the Bill of Rights of 1689 be repealed and updated by newer 'Acts', so long as they are still in line with the Declaration of Rights, 1688.

The public servants are therefore bound by the Constitution (the collection of documents; Magna Carta, Declaration of Rights, common law rulings etc) and to do their duty according to the statutory Acts (internal "positive law"), which should be in accordance with the Constitution, lest they be unlawful (unconstitutional).

Bills follow Orders. But with regards to Trusts, it is the Trustees (servants / agents) that are Billed when given Orders by the Beneficiary, as it is the Trustees that have the duty to carry out the Orders for the Beneficiary, so long as those Orders are accepted. The Bill may be for a continuous type of service with regards to Trusts.

( Registration of a right or property establishing it in Trust | Fundamentals of Trusts | Fundamentals of the common law etc. (1-5) )
OneManAndHisDog
 
Posts: 108
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 6:10 am

PreviousNext

Return to General chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests