R4C - Refusal for Cause

Re: R4C - Refusal for Cause

Postby free_spirit » Wed Nov 18, 2009 4:02 pm

Would you adam and eve it. Just got this today and it's going off to them
within the next hour :grin:

I've attached a mail tracking sticker and will have it and my copy date stamped at the post office.

Must get a stamp, my writing is shit due to using the keyboard too much. But methinks even my
shit writing gets the point accross.

J
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by free_spirit on Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:51 am, edited 2 times in total.
WAKE UP PEOPLE OR ELSE ON YOUR DEATH BED YOU WILL BE THINKING, WHAT THE F**K WAS ALL THAT ABOUT
User avatar
free_spirit
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 267
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:48 pm

Re: R4C - Refusal for Cause

Postby kevin » Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:02 pm

is there a bit missing off that ticket?

it says " A request for a hearing involves prosecution and on conviction liability to a substantial fine"
kevin
Newbie
Newbie
 

Re: R4C - Refusal for Cause

Postby free_spirit » Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:14 pm

Hi Kevin,
no thats the lot if you look there's a perforation for a tear of and that's it. I believe that bit was on the back
and I seem remeber prison being mentioned.

Anyhow it's gone now and here's the copy date stamped by the post office. I hope this
is now water tight?

J
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by free_spirit on Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:52 am, edited 2 times in total.
WAKE UP PEOPLE OR ELSE ON YOUR DEATH BED YOU WILL BE THINKING, WHAT THE F**K WAS ALL THAT ABOUT
User avatar
free_spirit
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 267
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:48 pm

Re: R4C - Refusal for Cause

Postby the_common_law_reverend_kenny » Wed Nov 18, 2009 6:22 pm

Jayen4 wrote:
Not entirely sure what you're getting at here.... .

the bank and the courts are 'in bed together' !




That's what I was getting at, really, you put your finger on it already. Proving that the land charge is illegal would be a good(great) and powerful thing

:peace:
SOVEREIGN: not controlled by outside forces: autonomous; self-governing; independent "a sovereign people" <> "by any peaceful administritive means necessary" - the way of the order.
the_common_law_reverend_kenny
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 773
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:18 pm
Location: Fidach Diplomatic Outpost near You

Re: R4C - Refusal for Cause

Postby free_spirit » Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:31 pm

I just had a "lateral" thought on this.

I'm wondering if I should've left out without prejudice on the ticket?

My thinking is, neither they nor I can produce this as evidence (of a rejected contract) but they
they could produce their "clean" copy i.e without my refusal written
on it.

Just a thought.

J
WAKE UP PEOPLE OR ELSE ON YOUR DEATH BED YOU WILL BE THINKING, WHAT THE F**K WAS ALL THAT ABOUT
User avatar
free_spirit
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 267
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:48 pm

Re: R4C - Refusal for Cause

Postby huntingross » Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:38 pm

My position remains un-altered in regard to Without Prejudice.....there isn't a single thing I would write that I wouldn't want to produce if required.
Success nourishes hope
User avatar
huntingross
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4324
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 11:29 pm
Location: FIDACH, Near Edinburgh

Re: R4C - Refusal for Cause

Postby free_spirit » Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:41 pm

huntingross wrote:My position remains un-altered in regard to Without Prejudice.....there isn't a single thing I would write that I wouldn't want to produce if required.


I get your point, I think I'll leave it out in future.

J
WAKE UP PEOPLE OR ELSE ON YOUR DEATH BED YOU WILL BE THINKING, WHAT THE F**K WAS ALL THAT ABOUT
User avatar
free_spirit
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 267
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:48 pm

Re: R4C - Refusal for Cause

Postby Jim » Wed Nov 18, 2009 8:07 pm

huntingross wrote:there isn't a single thing I would write that I wouldn't want to produce if required.


Agreed. I don't think it matters if you include "Without Prejudice" or not. Your adversaries are going to do whatever suits them regardless. If that means leaving your carefully annotated document in the office and claiming you ignored their communications then that's what they'll do. What matters is that you've kept a copy and, if required, you can prove that you didn't dishonour their attempt to get you to contract with them and that they are, in point of fact, playing at silly buggers. If someone's determined to trample all over your rights they're going to attempt it whether you've stated that you reserve all of your rights or not. I like the statement that V's started using (check her latest blog post for details) along the lines of "All rights reserved with no admission of liability whatsoever at any time under any circumstances"

Peace

J
All rights reserved, all wrongs reversed.
User avatar
Jim
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 499
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 6:03 pm
Location: Sitting on the sofa in my living room

Re: R4C - Refusal for Cause

Postby free_spirit » Wed Nov 18, 2009 8:09 pm

Thanks Jim!

J
WAKE UP PEOPLE OR ELSE ON YOUR DEATH BED YOU WILL BE THINKING, WHAT THE F**K WAS ALL THAT ABOUT
User avatar
free_spirit
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 267
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:48 pm

Re: R4C - Refusal for Cause

Postby Jayen4 » Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:26 pm

the_common_law_reverend_kenny wrote:
Jayen4 wrote:
Not entirely sure what you're getting at here.... .

the bank and the courts are 'in bed together' !




That's what I was getting at, really, you put your finger on it already. Proving that the land charge is illegal would be a good(great) and powerful thing

:peace:




Oh,I see... How would I go about 'proving it' ?? I know very well that the title number that the bank is using to bring this action was never included on the re-mortgage of the now re-posessed house ! They confirmed that at the beggining,when the original solicitor rang me and asked ''Would you mind signing over ownership to this title number''. My problem as I see it,is the fact that the court is being biased and refusing to enter into evidence such things as 'Stat Decs',which I produced at the original re-posession hearing. How can I FORCE them to take notice ?
When I go in this time,if the judge starts that behaviour again,I am of a mind to tell him to his face that he is acting in a biased and corrupt manner and that if he is not going to listen to anything I say,then I shall ignore him too !! Might get me some jail time,but bollocks to them !! It's all too obvious what a farce this court thing has become.
Any advice much appreciated.
User avatar
Jayen4
 
Posts: 154
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:26 pm
Location: Nr Wakefield. West Yorkshire.

PreviousNext

Return to General chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron