Celebrity Doughnuts

Re: Celebrity Doughnuts

Postby cassandra » Sun Feb 05, 2017 4:00 am

Just one last comment to let you know that you reading my posts or not reading my posts is entirely and utterly irrelevant to me. You have nothing of value to contribute. Everything you write is derivative, plagiarised from the work of real researchers - all of whom have abandoned this site as well the freeman movement. Your writing is often puerile or just plain ordinary stupid. Your ability to engage in debate, discussion, is fatally compromised by your ego and your game playing. Feeling the need to tell me that you will not be reading three of my posts is straight from that ego, as though you reading my posts somehow matters to me; somehow removes something from me. Jesus! You are not worth bothering with so far, and I doubt you will ever contribute anything of value to this site or to anyone using it. But then, that's not why you are here, is it?
You may look or not look at my posts - it matters little enough to me. You should know also, in like manner, none of your posts will be read by me. Why should I bother? Absolutely nothing you've said or are likely to say is new. As for glossa, well that's been known for a long time and, like all other freeman nonsense, it has led nowhere in the slow motion agony of inevitable disappointment as all such things do. Like so many other deluded types on this and other freeman sites you will never learn. You are drawn in by the pseudo-reality of pseudo-legal commercial arguments constructed from wishful thinking, an international scam and the hypnotic semantics of crooked and greedy clever people who have never once achieved a success they can point to. As said before, in fifty years not one particle of the freeman claims has ever been proven or shown to work and year after year the hopeful, greedy fools sign up to it.
You will, of course, still reply to this last comment even though I've just told you I will not read anything with your name attached. You will do this because your ego will not allow you to pass it by, just as Dreadlock's would not let him desist from comments to me after I hit his no fly list - and you are concerned what others on the site may think. In all honesty your contributions here have been without value so you, like Dreadlock, may say what you please. I will not read anything with either of your names attached and my ego will not say different. Promise.
As much as I detest game-players, point scorers, arrogance and self importance, and as much as I struggle to be patient with low intellects, I wish you no ill. Be at peace with yourself if you can and try to move on.
Cassandra.
cassandra
 
Posts: 175
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 2:54 pm

Re: Celebrity Doughnuts

Postby Dreadlock » Sun Feb 05, 2017 10:18 am

So I point out a fairly obvious truth, offer some pretty good advice AND offer to apologise if I've made a mistake... and that's musashi/cassandra's finely say on the matter.

What does that tell you folks?

On the bright side I get to expose musashi/cassandra's inevitable lies and deceptions in new threads without having to take the time to respond to his response - because there won't be any.

Bonus.

One last bit of advice. Cassandra is finished musashi. Time for a new persona.
Dreadlock
 
Posts: 453
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 9:08 am

Re: Celebrity Doughnuts

Postby musashi » Tue Feb 07, 2017 7:26 am

Dreadlock wrote:So I point out a fairly obvious truth, offer some pretty good advice AND offer to apologise if I've made a mistake... and that's musashi/cassandra's finely say on the matter.

What does that tell you folks?

On the bright side I get to expose musashi/cassandra's inevitable lies and deceptions in new threads without having to take the time to respond to his response - because there won't be any.

Bonus.

One last bit of advice. Cassandra is finished musashi. Time for a new persona.


Oh dear.
I wonder if the fairly obvious truths you point out are along the line of 'terrorism doesn't count because it's a specialised crime'. That is weird and not what I would call an obvious truth. Isn't all crime speialised? I mean, a burglar is specialising in burglary is he not? A bank robber is specialising in robbing banks. Terrorism on the other hand does not seem to be so specialised, including as it does so many crimes - arson, murder, causing explosions, shooting, knifing, kidnapping, hijacking, beheading . . . You get the picture? It would seem that terrorism is the only one that does not specialise! And not only but also it is one of the very few that is international in flavour and kills A because B hurt his feelings. I have never heard of a bank being robbed because some bastard raped someone's son/daughter. Weird, innit? You'd fink it was 'appening all the time.
Lets see, if we discount terrorism - hijacking planes and so on - what other ordinary everyday crime can there be that necessitates such stringent and invasive security measures? Can you tell us? As I recall it all came in big time after 9/11

And how do you know what was or wasn't the reasons. Television tell you. did it? Weekly Sport or National Enquirer, maybe?

Giving only one side of the story? That's a bit weak even for you. Actually, it's embarrassingly downright pathetic! Or it would be if you had any sense of shame. Which of course you haven't since you apologise for child rapists and murderers and fight their corner so hard. P'rhaps you are one of them - a mozzie doing the ol' taqiyya trick.
Do you give both sides of the story when you slag the Jews.
Or the bankers?
Or the court system?
Or . . .well, anybody or anything, actually? Why the fuck not, you rotten one-sided fucker? Now that aint fair, is it? Why aint you giving my side of the story? I'm hurt!
Who does that - ever? Does anyone? Why would anyone who opposes something give their opponents side of the story except to destroy it.
Did The labour party do it when they fought the tories at election time? Or vice versa?
Oh,, come now, little one. Stand aside when the big boys play.

"Having had many of their countries bombed into hell over the past 26 years or so by western governments."

That's the PC programme talking there - justifying attacks on us cos we're so awful to the poor innocent Muslims and I've heard that rhetoric over and over from every PC prick I can't avoid listening to. It's the mantra you've been given and it is unsustainable.
How many is many?
When did we bomb
Albania
Algeria
Azerbaijan
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Brunei
Burkina Faso
Chad
Comoros
Djibouti
Egypt
Guinea
Indonesia
Iran
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kosovo
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Lebanon
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Mauritania
Mayotte
Morocco
Niger
Nigeria
Oman
Pakistan
Palestine
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Sierra Leone
Somalia
Sudan
Tajikistan
The Gambia
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus
Turkmenistan
United Arab Emirates
Uzbekistan
Western Sahara
Yemen
51 unbombed the shit out of Muslim majority countries.

Lybia. Limited surgical strikes. Do I approve or agree? No.
Iraq. Heavy duty bombing and fighting. Did I approve or agree? No.
Afghanistan. Limited strikes against Taliban and al Qaeda. No large scale bombing of anybody.
Syria ditto
So, one out of fifty two countries, 51 we have not been bombing the shit out of. A casual glance at things shws that actually, well, it's Muslims who're bombing the shit out of the countries cos they aint fuckin Muslim enough! And they're bombing us cos we aint Muslim at all! Don't for get Allah's odinances - killthe bastards wgerever you find them. Maybe that does not count on the weird world of Dread Men.
Where are all the "so many countries we have bombed the shit out of"?
And poor little Iamani thought it all so great! Jesus fuckin wept - and no wonder!

Like I said, you got the PC mantra and it is unsustainable to even the smallest enquiry.

"What does that tell you folks?"
Ah, playing to the audience. Thank you for that one. It's not about reality it's abut scoring points and putting the other guy down in public. We're bck to destroying credibility again? I think you just fucked your own credibility in the arse there , baby boy. Hope you saved some of that lube for yourself!

"On the bright side I get to expose musashi/cassandra's inevitable lies and deceptions"
Inevitable lies and Deceptions? Really? And we can find these inevitable lies and deceptions where, exactly?
In child rape gang reports?
In quotes from the Koran?
The Hadith?
From Islamic records?
From court records?
Or maybe in the need for cctv when all there is your claim to know the inside story of why cctv went up and why so much airport security was put in place? Well, you're gonna have to explain that one. How do you know what the motives and the agenda were? You on the inside, then? Jack Straw consult you did he? Good ol' Jack - ah, just remembered he's a feckin Jewboy, aint he? No, you'd not deal with him or believe a word the poor Jewish man said.

Well, I've had enough of this one. It's too easy. Bring on the next bleeding heart liberal socialist PC guilt trip mantra, please. They fall apart when you look at them. You should try it someday and save yourself the self-humiliating agony you put yourself through.
Musashi.
ISLAM DELENDA EST
User avatar
musashi
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 1114
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 6:21 pm

Previous

Return to General chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest