i don't think i have said much since my initial news of getting a summons, i will be updating this soon but in the meantime if i have not already mentioned, i have already sent a notice to the council and today i sent a notice of estoppel using the portion of the template as posted by veronica, it read as follows.
In care of:
Address
Address
Address
Near: [postcode]
21st June, 2009
< spot the mistake, i think maybe i'm f###ed, this is what comes
about when rushing, i imagine this invalidates my notice. it's supposed to say july
Re: Account xxxxxxxxx
NOTICE OF DISHONOUR & ESTOPPEL BY ACQUIESCENCE
To:
STRATIGIC DIRECTOR
CUSTOMER SERVICES
xxxxxxxxxx COUNCIL
xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxx
Mxxxxxxxxxx
Dear STRATIGIC DIRECTOR,
Please read the following notice thoroughly and carefully. It is a notice. It informs you. It means what it says.
I refer to the Notice sent to you via recorded with a postal date of 14th July, 2009
In which I offered conditional agreement, that I am legal fiction 'person' Mr x xxxxxxxxxx and that I owe £576.23 for services rendered by your company, upon proof of claim of all of the following:
1. Upon proof of claim that I am a person, and not a human being.
2. Upon proof of claim that you know what a 'person' actually is, in legal terms.
3. Upon proof of claim that you know the difference between a 'human being' and a 'person', legally speaking.
4. Upon proof of claim that you know the difference between 'legal' and a 'lawful'.
5. Upon proof of claim that I am legal fiction 'person' Mr x xxxxxxxxxx, being the entity to which your paperwork was addressed, and not xxxxxxx: of the xxxxxxxxxx family, as commonly called.
6. Upon proof of claim that the charge was the result of a lawful investigation unmarred by prejudice.
7. Upon proof of claim that I am a member of the society whose statutes and subsisting regulations you are enforcing.
8. Upon proof of claim that I showed you some sort of identification.
9 Upon proof of claim that there is a nameable society that I belong to and that the laws covered within any alleged transgressions state that they apply to me within that named society.
The reason why you were needed to read carefully for the reason as first stated I offered conditional agreement. This was sought in order to remove controversy, and meant that you no longer had any ultimate recourse to a court of law in this matter, because there is no controversy upon which the court could adjudicate. There was always the option in which you could drag these conditions into a court of law only to be told that they are, indeed, perfectly lawful. That is, of course, always your prerogative should you decide to waste your time.
It was for this important reason it that you considered and responded to the offer in substance. The Notice stated that the 'nearest official form' will not suffice, and consequently in al likeliness be ignored by myself without any dishonour on my part; given that the time frame as laid out has lapsed, and given that I have received no substantive response.
It is now My Understanding that it was lawful for me to send you the previous Notice.
It is now My Understanding that I could and did provide, within that Notice, time for objections to be resolved honourably on both sides.
It is now My Understanding that it is lawful for me to assume that, since you have not responded in substance (to the best of my knowledge) I have your tacit consent (by acquiescence) to the Proofs I requested, which now stand as My Truth, in Law.
It is now My Understanding that it is now possible for me to assume that, since the proper time for your objections has expired, I have gained a lawful estoppel by your acquiescence.
It is now My Understanding that I have acted in honour at all times, since you have not objected to what I said.
It is now My Understanding that it is now possible for me to point out that you must henceforth cease and desist from all and any activity regarding this current matter, or that any further communications from you will be considered to be unlawful harassment, and can be disregarded by My Self without dishonour.
Sincerely and without ill will, vexation or frivolity
By: (Authorised Representative\Agent)
xxxxxx: of the xxxxxxxxxxfamily
WITHOUT PREJUDICE, i.e. all Natural Inalienable Rights Reserved
Please address all future correspondence in the matter to a direct Human Self, namely xxxxx: of the xxxxxxxxfamily, as commonly called.
i previously sent a letter to the magistrates and have not heard a word but i plan on bringing the estoppel on the day of court. it's not the best way to do it but i'm working with the situation as it best lends itself.
jono i find the question you posed as worth a mini discussion and as time permits i will get back to it. i have so much on with court etc that it's consuming a heck of a lot of time. i wonder if any other members would like to add to jono's query.
peace is love
"namaste"