Police by consent- How do you think about this quote

We welcome all new members and visitors to the Forum, please introduce yourself here, point to your own website/blog or point to articles of interest that you have created.

Police by consent- How do you think about this quote

Postby jonathan01n » Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:58 am

It should be noted that it refers to the power of the police coming from the common consent of the public, as opposed to the power of the state. It does not mean the consent of an individual. No individual can chose to withdraw his or her consent from the police, or from a law. :no:
jonathan01n
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 2:44 pm

Re: Police by consent- How do you think about this quote

Postby iamani » Mon Jul 24, 2017 2:59 pm

Hi jonathan01n

i think, and i know, that if that is your opinion then you are entitled to it - but you're wrong.

Cheers!
law is all is love is all is law
iamani
 
Posts: 259
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2016 5:06 pm

Re: Police by consent- How do you think about this quote

Postby enegiss » Fri Aug 18, 2017 1:52 pm

jonathan01n wrote:It should be noted that it refers to the power of the police coming from the common consent of the public, as opposed to the power of the state. It does not mean the consent of an individual. No individual can chose to withdraw his or her consent from the police, or from a law. :no:


There is no consent unless explicitly stated, all else is assumption borne from the conviction of ones indoctrination. If i had to comment then it would be "mend your broken will" if you believe that one set of people has somehow "magically" got the right to rule because of squiggly lines on a parchment that they themselves wrote.

The Public is a body politic and by definition regulated by statutory instrument

What is PUBLIC?

Pertaining to a state, nation, or whole community; proceeding from, re- lating to, or affecting the whole body of people or an entire community. Open to all; notorious. Common to all or many; general ; open to common use. Morgan v. Cree, 46 Vt. 786, 14 Am. Rep. 640; Crane v. Waters (C. C.) 10 Fed. 621; Austin v. Soule, 36 Vt. 650; Appeal of Eliot, 74 Coun. 586, 51 Atl. 558; 0'IIara v. Miller, 1 Kulp (Pa.) 295. A distinction has been made between the terms "public" and "general." They are sometimes used as synonymous. The former term is applied strictly to that which concerns all the citizens and every member of the state; while the latter includes a lesser, though still a large, portion of the community. 1 Greenl. Ev.

What is GENERAL?

Pertaining to, or designating, the genus or class, as distinguished from that which characterizes the specifics or individual. Universal, not particularized; as opposed to special. Principal or central; as opposed to local. Open or available to all, as opposed to select. Obtaining commonly, or recognized universally; as opposed to particular.Universal or unbounded; as opposed to limited. Comprehending the whole, or directed to the whole; as distinguished from anything applying to or designed for a portion only.


now we all know, that statutes do not pertain to people generally but are regarded by the CITIZEN as LAW.

When all said and done, there are slaves, and there are free men.
if you wish to create a favourable History, then you have to start now.
enegiss
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 1324
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 9:10 pm

Re: Police by consent- How do you think about this quote

Postby iamani » Sat Aug 19, 2017 8:23 pm

Hi energiss

Hear, hear! Well put.

...and how can 'the public' consent when it's composed of dead entities/persons? A group of persons has no more 'will' then one person and free will is necessary for consent.

Cheers!
law is all is love is all is law
iamani
 
Posts: 259
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2016 5:06 pm


Return to Welcome to the Freeman-on-the-land Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests