Subject: Another Starchild?
From: Veronica
Date: 9/4/14 12:43 pm
To: undisclosed-recipients:;

(From Mike)

My emphasis:

The results of a DNA analysis of one of the skulls are now back, and Brien Foerster, author of more than ten books and an authority on the ancient elongated headed people of South America, has just revealed the preliminary results of the analysis. He reports on the geneticist's findings: It had mtDNA (mitochondrial DNA) with mutations unknown in any human, primate, or animal known so far. But a few fragments I was able to sequence from this sample indicate that if these mutations will hold we are dealing with a new human-like creature, very distant from Homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans. The implications are of course huge. “I am not sure it will even fit into the known evolutionary tree,” the geneticist wrote. He added that if the Paracas individuals were so biologically different, they would not have been able to interbreed with humans.

First of all, Mark Passio wrote about these (what are called) 'coneheads'. They fit (in size & shape) with depictions of the Annunaki on the Ancient Sumerian Tablets. (See Mark's video "Cosmic Abandonment"
... which he dedicates to Lloyd Pye)

Lloyd was also very interested in 'coneheads', because - like his Starchild - all the normal reasons for the shape can be debunked. (In the same way the the Starchild's anomalies ... as so-called 'natural deformities' ... can be debunked).

mtDNA (mitochondrial DNA) comes only from the Mother, and lies between the Cell Wall and the Cell Nucleus. This was the first DNA that was extracted from the Starchild (actually quite easily).

It's the nuDNA (nuclear DNA) that comprises 50% Mother/Father. This was the DNA that was impossible to extract until the last 3-4 years. However, the techniques for doing so now exist, and hopefully it will be done for the Paracus Skulls.

Expect even more fundamental surprises.

We have NEVER "been alone".

Veronica xxx