Subject: Fwd: FORVIK - A Free Nation
From: Veronica
Date: 22/3/14 1:50 pm
To: undisclosed-recipients:; 



A video by My Original Most Humble and Grateful Servant, former Acting First Minister Stuart: of the family Hill:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PtVoHNrJZU
(Video created by My Foreign Minister, Danny: of the family Bamping).

In that video you will see how other (prominent) Shetlanders view their position, insofar as they are hazy in their knowledge regarding their history.

The essential point, NOT (unfortunately!) brought out in that video ... is that:

1. It must be stressed that the King of Norway only PAWNED "that part of the Orkneys and Shetlands that he actually owned" (obviously on the basis of being able to redeem that pawning when the gilt was available) ... and ...

2. "That part of the Orkneys and Shetlands that he actually owned" never amounted to more than 10% of those islands.

OR "90% of those islands ALWAYS HAVE belonged to the Owners of those lands" ... in other words The People Who Lived There. (Under Norse/Udal Law, land is owned outright by whoever first claims it).

Intimate details of all of this in Stuart's book "Stolen Isles".

The essential point - in practical terms - comes down to this:

Stuart has proved, by poking and prodding "The United Kingdom" that if anything can be tied back to Forvik, or to the Shetlands themselves ... no UK Agency will go so far as "Court" with any matter.

Because UK Agencies (e.g. the DVLA) now know that - in Court - the first question they would have to answer is "When did the Shetlands become a part of Scotland ... and therefore the UK ... such as to give this Court any jurisdiction?"

And they now know that is an unanswerable question ... unless they try to claim that a Magazine Article can define "Law" and grant jurisdiction.

There is now evidence to suggest that (for example) a conveyance RECORDED by the Forvik Vehicle Recording Agency ... defines "a foreign car on English roads" ... and is now recognised as such by the UK DVLA ... and not subject to UK Statutes, such as Road Tax, etc.

Because the DVLA don't want to have to answer the question "When did the Shetlands become a part of Scotland ... and therefore the UK ... such as to give the DVLA any legitimacy over, or interest in, this vehicle?"

Vxxx