I'll be sending a separate e-mail about the events in Crown Court
last Friday morning.
However, one of the things I created over the weekend (in Derby) ...
was another version of a rebuttal letter to 'most things' ... e.g.
Penalty Charge Notices, etc. etc. etc.
I referred to it during my Presentation in Milton Keynes, on Sunday.
I offered to send a copy out to anyone who requested it, so I attach
it to this e-mail.
As usual, it does not delve into any 'specifics' ... but simply
rebuts (just about any circumstance) based on the Bill of Rights
I was asked if it had 'some kind of track record'.
Well, one answer is that "It could probably be taken
as a 'condensation' of the arguments I used in my 'Council Tax
Of course, the other answer is that "The point is bleeding
obvious!". Particularly since it contains a quotation
from information readily available on the Government Legislation
I suggest it is used as it stands ... in other words:
1. You need to put 'an address' at the top, just in case
they send you a letter 'admitting it was a mistake'. (Let's face
it ... they can get your address from the DVLA at the click of a
2. DON'T wet signature it! Simply send it back PRINTED "Peaceful
Inhabitant" or "Man/Woman of Peace".
3. Place their address at the bottom ... to signify
they are 'below' you.
4. Whatever they initially respond will be Robotic
Statements of Statutory Bollox (RSSB). The first time you could
respond by saying:
I write in reference to your letter of the <date>
which comprised nothing other than Robotic Statements of
Statutory Bollox (hereinafter referred to as RSSB).
In honour (in order to retain clean hands) I am extending
your period of grace, and giving you one last chance to sign
the Affidavit, which I enclose - in case you mislaid the
You now have seven (7) days to either sign it or to admit your
mistake in writing.
Yours sincerely ... etc ... as before
And let's see what happens!
Oh ... by way ... the FIRST time this "Affidavit" technique was
used ... 'They' won in the end ... BUT ONLY BECAUSE THE CAR IN
QUESTION WAS A COMPANY CAR! The Company paid ... and then
deducted it from the Employee's salary.
If it had been a private car, 'They' would have been well
and truly fucked (I assure you). (It went to 3 letters
back & forth before they wrote to the Company ... in