Last December, Michael Doherty obtained an Injunction against the
Roman Catholic Bishop of London, John Arnold (whose father was a
Freemason ... so what does that say about John Arnold?), and the
Roman Catholic Church.
(We have evidence to suggest that it has been passed to the Vatican
... to deal with).
Background: All part & parcel of the sorry tale
of corruption, that surrounds Michael's situation. Kicked off in
relation to his original accusation that his daughter was being
groomed over the Internet.
There is a "Roman Catholic" component to all this: When he went to
pick up his daughter from school (he had custody of his daughter, at
the time), he was told that he would not be allowed to take her
The school decided to get into bed with the S(ocial) S(ervices).
Michael did a Data Protection request, demanding copies of any
information the Roman Catholic Diocese was keeping on him.
Bishop Arnold sent Michael an e-mail saying that the material was
going to be destroyed.
Michael obtained an Injunction to stop them doing that, and served
it during Mass at Westminster, just before Paganmas.
At a subsequent Hearing (to make the Injunction permanent) they
claimed that they would not supply the material.
The reason they gave for withholding it was because it would give
Michael the means to sue the Roman Catholic church.
Right. You can't have it because, if we gave it to you, you
could sue us (successfully).
Presumably they can just say 3 "Hail Marys", while fingering some
beads ... and they would be in the clear? (Isn't that the way it
They lost the argument. The Injunction stays.