With regard to my latest e-mail about 9/11, I was asked the
following questions (about things I did not bother to mention):
What about the eye witnesses and mobile
phone images? I would find it difficult to believe that every one
of those who said they saw one or both planes were actors. People
described the type of plane, its colour and having no windows.
Eyewitness accounts are only valid if there is no Forensic evidence.
But there is Forensic evidence ... buckets of
it ... and it ALL says the eyewitnesses are full
So ... eyewitnesses count for nothing.
Furthermore, 6 months prior to 9/11, there was a TV Film called The
Lone Gunman. This was the brainchild of Chris "X-Files"
Carter. The plot comprised "Hijacked plane ... being flown
into the WTC Tower - by terrorists".
Apart from the amazing "co-incidence" (????), in the TV Film - right
at the last moment - the Good Guys managed to get into the Remote
Control System, and divert the plane over to top of the Tower.
How many eyewitnesses had that TV Film in mind, when they made
the statements they made?
Furthermore, a friend - involved in litigation - got his partner to
write an Affidavit. She said that she was with him "all day", and
could (therefore) verify what he had said/done "all day". He said "No
... you were not with me in the afternoon". She maintained
(for YEARS!) (most assuredly) that she was. He finally showed her a
Text Message, that she had sent to him, on that day, saying "See
you at 6pm". Which must have meant that she was not with him
during the afternoon of that day.
Forensic evidence (e.g. the Text Message) trumps "eyewitness"
(i.e. what people honestly believe ... with all their heart &
There were no "Mobile Phone images" (any more than the possibility
of using a Mobile Phone on a plane, in 2001!).
There were Amateur Videos showing 'planes'. This was because a
company called "Camera Planet' put out a call for all amateur
footage, saying it wanted to collect as much footage as possible.
When the footage was returned, 'planes' had been added.
However, because it was all done in so much of a rush, many of
the added images were incomplete ('Amputated planes') & and
different Flight Paths etc.
It was such a complete cock-up ... that it was laughable.
This has all been re-evaluated endlessly, and I
have too much else to do than to discuss 9/11 any further.
If you want more information ... I'm afraid you'll have to do the
Either that, or accept the fact that a Team of VERY INTELLIGENT
Researchers looked at the situation back in 2004/5/6, and came to
the inescapable conclusions that I wrote in my previous
ANYTHING you hear about 9/11 - and so-called "9/11
Truth" - is bollox ... unless it matches up with the 'sterile
research' done by Dr. Morgan Reynolds, Dr. Judy Wood, Gerard
Holmgren, Rosalee Grable, Nico Haupt, Andrew Johnson, Rick Siegel,
and Veronica: of the Chapman family, with Jeff King, Jeff Strahl +
a few others who don't wish to be named.
We used the Law to come to our conclusions.
The REAL Law.
The ONLY REAL Law.
The Laws of Physics, Chemistry & Thermodynamics.