Subject: 9/11: Veronica & Morgan take on Massachusetts Institute of Technology
From: Veronica
Date: 12/12/13 1:52 pm
To: undisclosed-recipients:;

(and Jim Fetzer & Gordon "Veterans Today" Duff ... along with Antony Lawson)

(Read bottom up)

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: WTC Aircraft Impact Damage Professor of Applied Mechanics, MIT
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:44:19 +0000
From: Tabitha <Tabitha@VeronicaChapman.com>
To: Morgan Reynolds <nomoregames.net@gmail.com>, Anthony Lawson <lawson911@gmail.com>, James Fetzer <jfetzer@d.umn.edu>, Gordon Duff <gpduf@aol.com>


I assume you will all accept that the Massachusetts Institute of Technology is considered to be one of the finest institutes of its kind in the world
Well ... I don't ... that's for sure.

What I consider about MIT is that it is OBVIOUSLY a shell organisation for the CIA.

And anyone, connected with MIT, who actually TRIES to put forward the Truth is ... 'eliminated' ... such as Dr. Eugene Mallove (chief science writer at MIT's news office).
Conventional science and scientists hold that the twin towers virtually disappeared b/c of kerosene and office fires
So ... if I were to light a kerosene stove (according to MIT), it would melt & disappear into it's own footprint?

And ... if 'jet fuel' can vapourise a 757/767 ... then that must mean (according to MIT), then when the Captain switches on the jet engines ... they vapourise.

I have an option on some seafront property in Switzerland ... would anyone at MIT be interested?

Veronica


On 11/12/13 4:34 pm, Morgan Reynolds wrote:
Anthony,
 
    Naturally I will look at this link.  But here is my initial response:
 
1. Conventional science and scientists hold that the twin towers virtually disappeared b/c of kerosene and office fires despite the physical impossibility of such an event.  Where did the 110 floors from each tower stack up?  Nowhere b/c they were mostly Blowin’ in the wind as Bob Dylan would sing.  So much for establishment science and its prestige—BOGUS.  Prestige is for people who cannot think for themselves.  That ain’t me, buddy.  MIT is dependent on the MIC for much of its funding, or don’t you know this?  In a crunch, its administrators and scientists salute whom?  The truth or their paymaster, the serial liars called the government?  This question nearly answers itself, doesn’t it?  Reread Dwight D. Eisenhower’s farewell address if you are still stumped.
 
2. Oh, four alleged 767/757 airliner crashed on 9/11 2001!?  Really?  Where’s the evidence?  My objections to this lie are nearly endless but let’s begin with aluminum airliners disappearing into steel/concrete towers in violation of Newton’s third law (‘equal and opposite’)?  BS.  Towers much weaker than airliners?  Bull.  And you can’t show me one 40’-tall tail section post-crash?  Let me spell it out this time: BULLSHIT.  The tail section snaps off in most airliner crashes b/c it’s a lot of size and weight placed at the end of a long if not strong aluminum air frame.  Real simple physics, Anthony.  For a recent example, check out this Asiana flight 214 crash in which the tail separates immediately even though the collision with the ground is far from head on.  And on 9/11 all alleged airliner crashes left no separated tail sections?  Not one!?  Nor any connected to a fuselage!  That’s impossible so there must have been some MIC magic in that old silk hat on 9/11 ...  http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/passengers-and-witnesses-recall-asiana-crash/ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/07/video-of-asiana-crash_n_3558524.html http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/video/asiana-airlines-crash-seconds-horror-flight-214-19612468  There was a better amateur video of the Asiana 214 crash than Fred Hayes’ but I can’t locate it now.  Here is what happened near where I live at the Little Rock airport when a plane overran the runway and hit a little bit of steel (cable and landing lights, June 1999): http://www.airdisaster.com/photos/aa1420/5.shtml (9 photos).
 
Sincerely,
Morgan Reynolds, Ph.D. (economics)
Professor emeritus, Texas A&M University
 
P.S.  Anthony, aren’t you impressed by my Prestige?  I’ve got letters after my name.  Convincing of...what exactly?  Well, you’re right, prestige is ‘the second-hander’s delusion,’ ‘the desire for unearned greatness’ (Ayn Rand). 
 
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 12:33 AM
Subject: WTC Aircraft Impact Damage Professor of Applied Mechanics, MIT
 
I assume you will all accept that the Massachusetts Institute of Technology is considered to be one of the finest institutes of its kind in the world, so you would have a hard time convincing the author of this article that the videos showing the impacts of the two aircraft that hit the World Trade Center on September 11the, 2001 were faked, in some way.  But I would be fascinated to see you try, on one or other of your disinformation websites.

Aircraft Impact Damage

Tomasz Wierzbicki
Professor of Applied Mechanics, MIT
Liang Xue
Ph.D. Candidate of Ocean Engineering, MIT
Meg Hendry
-
Brogan
Undergraduate student of Ocean Engineering, MIT

http://web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/PDFfiles/Chapter%20IV%20Aircraft%20Impact.pdf

Anthony Lawson
--
Only fools believe what they are told, when it is clear that much else is being hidden.