Here's the story:
Here the story behind it
1. G4S are supposed NOT to come under exactly the same Regulations
as Court Security Officers ... but ... in practice
... from all the information Michael has collected so far
(including the response to a Freedom of Information request) ...
they are allowed to function using the same UTTERLY SHODDY methods
2. Notice, in that article, the lack of the most essential question:
What medication was Carter on?
His GP sent him to counselling, but he quit
after two sessions because the counsellor annoyed him.
"There has been evidence before the court of
Mr Carter's medical state and there is nothing to add"
So that's OK, then?
An innocent woman was horribly bludgeoned to death ... for no
apparent reason ... and the perpetrator has been
sentenced to 20 years.
Pats on backs all round.
Case now closed.
Actually ,,, it's not. Very much not.
What FUCKING DRUGS was he on? Because whoever prescribed that
SHYTE is AS GUILTY AS CARTER ... in fact MORE SO.
And those who manufactured that UTTER FUCKING SHYTE, EVEN
MORE GUILTY THAN THAT!
In fact, the REAL GUILTY PARTIES have got away with it completely
... as they always do.