Subject: Poisson Rouge
From: Veronica
Date: 27/10/13 2:04 pm
To: undisclosed-recipients:;

I’ve (yet again) been passed this link to Brian Shaw’s attempts to use litigation to bring “high level officials” to Court, in Oz.

http://199.85.215.243/Affidavit_Brian_Shaw_vs_AEC.pdf

It is my considered opinion that it is a massive poisson rouge (a herring of the red persuasion). Shaw (it appears) is up in arms about the fact that references to “The Crown” have been silently removed from Australian Statutory bollox.

If my reading is correct, then Shaw has not done anything like enough homework, and seems to think that “The Crown” is synonymous with “The Queen”. Which it is very much not.

(It's a red herring because "removal of these references" doesn't make any difference either way).

“The Crown” (sometimes called “The British Crown”) is actually The Vatican … via its ‘subsidiary’ the Inner City of London. Including the four Inns of Court, Inner Temple, Middle Temple, Lincolns Inn and Grays Inn.

The essential facts are that: In 1213, TWO YEARS BEFORE signing the Magna Carta in 1215, King John I (as I will refer to him, since John Harris has unilaterally decided that he will be King John II * … in a similar way, it seems … to the way David Shayler has decided that he is the reincarnation of Jesus Christ *), signed over England, Ireland and France … to the Vaticanall heirs & descendants in perpetuity”.

(* I think you’ll find that “cannabis” is the connection you might be looking for)

Notwithstanding the Act of Settlement 1701 (which is nothing more Statutory bollox, of course) –  says that “No Roman Catholic can sit on the Throne of England” – the Monarchs of England have ALL been “covert Roman Catholics” ever since, and to this day.

Because of what King John I did in 1213.

And that’s  why Pope Innocent III (gotta LOVE the names they give themselves!) immediately threw a big wobbly, and annulled the Magna Carta 1215.

(Ever wondered why these things are called a “Papal Bull”? What’s the bit that follows on after the  “bull …” prefix?).

That’s why the Vatican considers it OWNS you … via YOUR LEGAL FICTION NAME.

Did King John I  have the Right to do what he did? Well … he was CERTAIN that he could … but what do you think? (I know what I think!)

He was a fucking PSYCHOPATH … and his brother Richard I (Richard the Lionheart) wasn’t much better. (Richard lived in France, grew up in France, and couldn’t speak English. But he was fucking good at killing Arabs …)

The entire world is ruled by “The Crown” … a subsidiary of the Vatican.

As far as I have been able to check (and that’s over quite a long period of time), what is written here is absolutely correct:

http://lifeinthemix2.co.uk/the_house_of_windsor.html

(All the details therein)

Jordan Maxwell is on record as saying “The source of evil on this planet is the Vatican” … and he’s absolutely right.

(I find it interesting that both Jordan Maxwell and George Carlin were brought up Roman Catholic. I can’t remember who said it … probably Carlin … “Yes, I was a Roman Catholic until I reached the age of reason”)

Vxxx