I have to say that - in my humble opinion - "Trusts" will get you
absolutely nowhere fast.
In point of fact, the whole thing is actually "BETRAYALS of Trust",
which is why I don't go anywhere near them, myself.
(If you read the Trusts Act 2000, you'll find that it
says "You can be involved in a Trust, AND THEY DON'T EVEN
HAVE TO TELL YOU". If that's not "Betrayal of Trust"
... I'd like to know what is. The whole thing is, in my view, complete
and utter bollox and a complete waste of time.
Sorry Mike, but them's my HIGHLY EXPERIENCED views.)
However, it's your lives, and it's up to all you what you do with
The Common Law is where Trusts SHOULD initiate.
And, if they did, there would be some sense to them.
However, Trusts don't initiate from the The Common Law these days.
They initiate from "Government".
And "Government" is IMMORAL, FASCIST, SELF-SERVING, CORRUPT,
DISHONOURABLE ... BY DEFINITION
If you think, for one second, you can somehow work on their
playing-field ... which is tilted VERTICALLY against you ... go
However, as I said, it's your lives, and it's up to all you what
you do with them.
In 5-6 years I've known a lot of people, who created a lot of
paperwork, but I don't know a single person who can legitimately
claim that the "Trusts paperwork" actually achieved anything
Just like OPPT ... it's all "theory" ... and up against a
system that writes all its own rules, they way it wants them,
and just laughs when someone else tries to use them.
Henry David Thoreau:
"There are a thousand hacking at the
branches of evil to one who is striking at the root"
If you want to hack at the branches ... rather than strike at the
root ... that's fine ... it's your life.
I've been asked to put this out ... I've put it out.