I went to Simon's meeting.
Peter, Hedley & Mike ... on this list ... were also at the
Thus, what I say, will be sent to them and - since they were there
as well - they'll be able to judge if what I say is true.
Simon's fundamental plan is to "Wake up everyone in the
UK - to the frauds of the Banksters - in the next FOUR
The meeting was to discuss how that could be done ... or - at least
- to kick-start it.
Now, apart from the ambitious nature of that plan, I see a few
1. Waking EVERYBODY up ... isn't necessary for a Critical Mass.
Actually, the number required for a Critical Mass is amazingly
small, for some reason (probably the 100th Monkey Syndrome).
2. The basis - the foundation - is incredibly shaky. Fundamentally
Simon assumed that he was talking to "Those who had woken up".
ZERO attention was - apparently - given to the fact that there's "waking
up", and there's "WAKING UP"! And that most in the
audience were a very long way from "Having WOKEN UP". Someone
actually suggested linking up with the idiot Kevin Annett and his
ITCCS garbage. I think someone even mentioned the ludicous OPPT
rubbish. THIS IS -NOT- "WOKEN UP"! "WOKEN UP" is when
you understand that the ITCCS, OPPT, Roger Hayes "Lawful Bank", Alex
Jones, David Icke, John Harris, Sarah Lioness, the UK Column ...
etc. ARE GARBAGE. AND YOU KNOW WHY. That's "WOKEN UP"!
3. Following on from (2), above, there was a very 'telling'
moment for me. This was when Simon asked fro a show of hands as to
who wanted to "Get involved in some way or other". Now let's
remember ONE IMPORTANT THING. This is all about "How the Courts
will not allow us the justice to which we are entitled".
because, if we had REAL Courts - OF JUSTICE - and THE SYSTEM WASN'T
SKEWED AND UTTERLY CORRUPT ... we'd have no problem! So ... one
would think that "Experience in the various Courts & Star
Chambers" aka "Actual experience at the sharp end of the
system" ... would be invaluable?
Well, I would.
Now, Peter has considerable experience in this aspect. Maggot's
Circuses, County Star Chambers and High Star Chambers. I know,
because I've been there with him ... on most (but not all) of those
Mike has considerable experience of dealing with this fraud at
Maggot's Circus level. I know, because of what he's said, and the
conversation I had with him prior to the meeting ...
in the Pub across the road.
I have considerable experience in this aspect. Maggot's Circuses,
County Star Chambers, High Star Chambers and Crown Courts.
(Michael Doherty wasn't at this meeting, and neither was Ian
Puddick, but both have REAL Court Experiences ... and I think they
would agree that "You can't make any REALISTIC plans or
assumptions WITHOUT that kind of experience"? That a big part
of "WAKING UP" is gaining that experience?)
The telling moment was when Simon asked for 'volunteers'.
98% of those there immediately put their hands up.
I didn't put my hand up (Court & Star Chamber experience!)
Mike didn't put his hand up (Maggot's Circus experience!)
I didn't look to see Peter's hand, but I doubt if he put it up
(Star Chamber experience would have kept it down, I think! He'll
tell me if I'm wrong)
And I can't imagine Michael Doherty's or Ian Puddick's hands
going up at that time, either (Court & Star Chamber
Even Guy Taylor ... whose Court & Star Chamber Experience is
second to none ... and who willingly volunteers for most things
"Freeman" ... would have been hard pressed to put his hand up at
that time ... after having heard what was said up to that point.
And that - for me - was the 'telling moment'.
Absolutely NO RECOGNITION of the difference between "waking up " and
Absolutely NO RECOGNITION of the EXPERIENCE and WISE COUNSEL that
comes from ACTUAL COURT & STAR CHAMBER EXPERIENCE.
I wish them well, hearts are in the right place (obviously), but a
woeful lack of REAL EXPERIENCE to SET THEM OFF ON THE ***RIGHT***
COURSE ... in my humble opinion.
They don't even know the difference between a Court
& a Star Chamber!
They don't even know the difference between "Legal" &
(I was even accused - at one point - by someone in the audience - of
"Stating OPINIONS" when I was actually "Stating FACTS based on
EXPERIENCE". It seems, to me, that there's a big problem when it
starts on that basis)