Subject: Norwich Warren up & running ...
From: Veronica
Date: 2/5/13 10:56 am
To: undisclosed-recipients:;

http://forum.norwichwarren.org/

It's designed to be a place for White Rabbit Education in Norwich ... but there's no reason why other Warrens (around the country) couldn't join in, and we can create their own space.

Norwich Warren is very much aligned & associated with VoidMortgages, and the efforts to win against the Possession Orders ... in fact there's this Hearing, in the Royal Courts of Justice, today:

Administrative Court at the RCJ daily cause list

Cause list Thursday, 2 May 2013
Updated: 1 May 2013 17.07 (refresh your browser for the latest version)
The following list is subject to change until 4.30pm. Any alterations after this time will be telephoned or emailed direct to the parties or their legal representatives.

 

COURT 28
Before CHARLES GEORGE QC
(Sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge)
Thursday 2 May, 2013
At 10 o'clock
FOR JUDGMENT
HAND DOWN
CO/12732/2011 The Queen on the application of Houghton And Wyton Parish  Council v Huntingdonshire District Council
 
Applications for Permission
CO/8891/2012 The Queen on the application of Oney v Secretary Of State For The Home Department
CO/9918/2012 The Queen on the application of Halili v Secretary Of State For The Home Department
CO/9635/2012 The Queen on the application of Gurung v Secretary Of State For The Home Department
CO/11947/2012 The Queen on the application of Younas v Secretary Of State For The Home Department
CO/11702/2012 The Queen on the application of Palmer v Land Registry

Not before 2 o'clock
CO/13484/2012 The Queen on the application of Ali v Secretary Of State For The Home Department
CO/11149/2011 The Queen on the application of Ali v Secretary Of State For Home Department

See the one in red. That's the Land Registry being asked to account for the reason why they will accept applications for a Charge placed on properties ... bearing in mind that the Registration Gap argument says (in Statutes):

"There's no mortgage and NO CONTRACT ... UNTIL the Charge is placed" ... and therefore
"There's no right, in Statutes, that enables the Charge to be Registered ... because there's no Contract in existence BEFORE the Charge is placed"

In other words: "Catch-22".

Vxxx