Imagine I am person "A".
And I know someone, who we can call person "B" … who doesn't have a
car, but needs one.
And I also know someone, who we can call person "C", who has a car.
Now, can I give C's car to B? Am I entitled to do that?
Of course, the answer is "No!"
But … hold on! I also know lots of other people … let's call them D,
E, F … all the way through to Z.
Now, they all agree with me … that B should have C's car.
Can WE, that's me, B together with D … Z … all 25 of us … override
the fact that C's car doesn't belong to any of us, but …
nevertheless … because of our 'numerical advantage' in the matter …
give C's car to B?
Well, the answer is still "No!", isn't it?
It doesn't matter how many I have on my side … it's NOT my car …
it's not OUR car ... it belongs to C … and I (or We) have no Right
to give it to B!
(Sorry, B, no can do! You'll just have to walk!)
D … Z is an "Electorate". And I'm a "Politician". And D .. Z (and
possibly B, as well) voted for me. And C is someone who didn't vote
Does that change anything? Does that somehow give me any superior
Right - to override the wishes of C - just because I have an
Electoral Vote behind me?
Errr … nope!
Thus ANY CLAIM I MAY HAVE …TO ANY 'SUPERIOR' RIGHTS … just because I
was "democratically elected" … IS BOGUS … ILLEGITIMATE.
As an Elected Politician, I have no more Rights to ANYTHING … than
My Rights are:
1. Exactly the same, and
2. Exactly the same size.
… as any other individual.
So … if that's the case … what is the point of me being a
Politician? What is the point of ANY Politician? What is the point
Oh … you tell me … because all I can see is ILLEGITIMACY (however
"democratically" I was elected!)
NOTHING ANY POLITICIAN DOES, HAS -ANY- LEGITIMACY.
And when a Politician - or group - write something down on a piece
of paper - as a result of any ritual they may go through via the
Houses of Parliament … THE RESULT IS STILL ENTIRELY
Isn't it about time we all realised this?
I think so.