Subject: I thought I write a bit more ...
From: Veronica
Date: 5/3/13 10:22 pm
To: undisclosed-recipients:;

... about Lawful Rebellion.

In previous e-mails Kenn d'Oudney explained, in detail, and at some length, what The Common Law is, and how it had been usurped. I then followed that with a 'short/sharp' version of my own.

But that all begs two questions:

1. What are Politicians & Parliament/Congress for, then?

2. What are Judges for, then?

Politicians & Parliament/Congress

What are they for? You tell me. They've had since 1295 to 'get it right', and what have they ever achieved? Don't forget, the whole idea of a Parliament was conceived and implemented UNDER The Common Law ... and was (and always has been) SUBSERVIENT to The Common Law. So ... at the end of the day ... what COULD they ever achieve ... that wasn't already achieved in 1215?

What do they do? Aaaah that's another matter! What they've done - since 1295 - is to relentlessly brainwash The Common Law away ... as much as possible. Originally this was very slow, and very much 'back burner' ... but in the 19th & 20th centuries it started to go 'exponential'. Culminating in 'today'.

They have instituted THEMSELVES ... along with Lawyers and Solicitors ... and entities such as the IPCC, CPS, ACPO, etc into our psyche as "the way it is, an always was" ... but  (a) That's not how it "always was", and (b) "The way it is", is totally unacceptable.

It was an 'experiment in Human Relations' ... and (after 700+ years of completely fucking about), I think we can safely say "The Great Experiment has completely failed"?

Time to dump this miserably-failed experiment into the dustbin of history? (Along with all its 'trappings'?)


A GOVERNMENT'S JOB IS TWO-FOLD:

(A) TO PROTECT THE BORDERS OF OUR NATION FROM INTRUDERS & INFILTRATORS (e.g. EU?), and
(B) TO ENSURE THAT OUR OUR COMMON LAW RIGHTS ARE ALWAYS PRESERVED (and never trampled on by an EU?).

That's it. They have no other job ... unless we want a 'monetary system' within our nation (to ensure smooth-running) ... in which case there's the third job:

(C) TO ISSUE DEBT- AND INTEREST-FREE MONETARY UNITS EQUALLY AND FAIRLY ... such that no-one is 'unhappy' about anything. (Taxation? No much point in issuing it, just to take it back, is there? Taxation becomes non-existent, in all forms)

Judges

Are there two do TWO (possible) jobs:

1. CRIMINAL: To run a Common Law Court, making sure that all the 'i's are dotted, and 't's crossed, in relation to evidence placed in front of the Jury. They are there to ensure that only FIRST-HAND evidence is placed before the Jury, such that it can come to a Verdict based on the maximum amount of Truth available.

2. CIVIL: To act as Arbitrators in Civil Disputes ... PROVIDED THAT BOTH PARTIES HAVE AGREED TO EMPLOY THE SAME ARBITRATOR ... ON THE BASIS OF BELIEVING THAT THEY CAN TRUST THE ARBITRATOR.

That's it.

What happens is that (a) They now no longer bother to ask you if you agree to an Arbitrator, and (b) Consider that "resolving a dispute between two Parties" is the same thing as "making Law". Which it isn't! If I see two friends arguing about something, and they ask my opinion, and I give it ... and they accept my opinion, as a resolution ... do I consider I've "made Law"? (No ... of course not!)

It is VERY HARD to see much need for Civil Dispute Arbitration ... when The Government is issuing debt- and interest-free Treasury Notes equally and fairly, and without Taxation ... as in (C), above.

Hope this helps.

Vxxx