Well, well, well!
We have 'known' for years that HMCS (Her Majesty's Court Services)
was nothing more than a Corporation ... on a par with Tesco or ASDA,
This was all explained, chapter & verse, in my book (over 4
Now we have the proof.
In a letter that was written to Michael Doherty.
Here are the links to a scanned copy of that letter:
See the final paragraph on the first page ... where it is admitted -
IN WRITING - that 'Courts are NOT public space'.
No ... they are not. They are no more 'public space' than a
They are - in point of fact - the 'entry point to a Star Chamber'
(something we've been saying for ages).
If you read that thoroughly disgusting and utterly biased letter,
there are a number of blatant mistakes and errors ... not least of
which being accusations that "Michael went to Cambridge with the
intent on causing confrontation".
The reason why this is so incorrect is simply because "Michael
went to Cambridge with the intent to lay information in front of
a Judge (as is everyone's Right, in Law). He stood his ground
under the assumption that he had the right to do that in a
(It MUST be noted that, following these events, Michael then went to
Luton Magistrates Court, laid the information in front of a Judge
there, and got the Indictments signed. Now figure that into what
this disgusting letter says!).
(As Michael says) If he had understood that it was not a Public
Building, then he would not have argued at all (any more than he
would have argued at being thrown out of Sainsbury's ... he would
have just said "OK ... I don't have to shop here ... I can take
my custom elsewhere" ... and gone to Tesco instead).
The letter also accuses Michael of "posting up information in the
Internet, that has been 'tweaked' to place him a good light".
What Michael has done is simply post up the CCTV footage - THEY TOOK
- of the incidents - UNTWEAKED.
The fact is that this letter damns them to hell.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again: THEY COULD -NOT- DO WHAT
THEY DO ... IF THEY WERE NOT UTTERLY BRAINWASHED, AND UTTERLY
And that's the reason why Michael, and all of us in Lawful
Rebellion, will keep on keepin' on. For our own sakes, for our
children's sakes ... and for our grand-children's sakes ... and
THEY CANNOT - ULTIMATELY - WIN. Everyone who sees this information
becomes 'knowledgeable' - to a greater or lesser extent.
"Knowing" is something that cannot be undone. That's why the English
Language does not have a word "unknow" ... because that is
impossible ("forgetting" is not the same as un-learning.
"Forgetting" can be corrected by "remembering").
So ... once someone "knows", they cannot "unknow". (They can carry
on, ignoring that knowledge of course ... but - deep down - they
realise they are being hypocritical).
Thus the number who will eventually "know" can only increase.
Thus the number who "know" will eventually outstrip the ignorant.
All it takes is "keepin' on keepin' on".